marketplace/skills/issue/references/format.md

Issue format

Canonical format for every issue in this project, whether it ever reaches a tracker or not. Designed to be unambiguous for both humans and LLMs: fixed English section headers in a fixed order, verifiable acceptance criteria, one issue = one deliverable. Source spec: the project wiki (Issues-Workflow).

Nothing here depends on Gitea. How these files are mapped onto a tracker is the sync layer's business — see /tea:sync.

Identity

An issue is one file, tmp/issues/<id>.md, and id is a slug: lowercase ASCII, digits, single dashes, derived from the title. The slug is the identity. It is stable for the life of the issue — a retitled issue keeps its slug; an issue pushed to a tracker, deleted locally and fetched back a month later keeps it too. Tracker numbers are a foreign key stored in a field, never the name of anything.

tmp/issues/wire-sqlc-appclick.md

A slug never contains a dot, which is how the store tells an issue from the files parked beside it (<id>.comments.md).

Stability is a promise the format makes, so something has to keep it once the file is gone. That is the sync layer's problem and its answer is a marker in the body — see /tea:sync; the domain neither writes nor reads it, and it never appears in the file on disk.

Metadata block

One field per line, lists inline, so plain grep works without a parser:

---
id: wire-sqlc-appclick
state: open
labels: [type/task, tech/sql]
assignees: [naudachu]
milestone: v0.2
depends: [migrate-schema]
wiki: [Simple Chains/Ideas/Chain core]
origin: gitea
branch: feat/wire-sqlc
gitea: claude-skills/tea#42
remote-updated: 2026-08-09T18:24:01Z
synced: 2026-08-09T18:40:00Z
url: https://git.noodles.cam/claude-skills/tea/issues/42
---
# Wire sqlc into the appclick repo layer

## Summary
…

Field	Owner	Meaning
id	domain	slug; equals the file name
state	domain	open or closed
labels	domain	see namespaces below; exactly one type/*
assignees	domain	logins; may be empty
milestone	domain	title, or none
depends	domain	ids this issue depends on — the authoritative graph
wiki	domain	page titles this issue is written up in; may be empty. Titles, not URLs — a title is a name for a document and stays in this layer, a URL is tracker bookkeeping. /tea:page owns what those titles mean; page_ls.py --titles prints them
origin	domain	local, or the name of a tracker this also lives in
gitea	sync	the handle in that tracker: owner/repo#N
branch	sync	the tracker's branch link (Gitea ref); push fills an empty one with the current git branch, and never overwrites a filled one
url, synced, remote-updated, comments	sync	bookkeeping

Domain fields render first, in the order above; sync fields follow, sorted.

origin is domain-owned on purpose: whether a piece of work exists anywhere but here is a fact about the work. Where that is, and how to reach it, is the sync layer's business — the domain carries gitea: and the rest through load/save verbatim and never reads them. That passthrough is why one file can represent a local issue and a synced one without a second format.

origin: local is a complete state, not a pending one. An issue that never leaves this machine is valid and finished work; pushing it is optional and nothing here treats it as a draft.

It is not a permanent state, and it is what the file's fate depends on:

origin:	what the file is	what a push does to it	what eviction does to it
local	the issue itself — the only copy there is	creates it in the tracker, then deletes the file	nothing, ever — in any state, named or not
a tracker	a working copy of something the tracker already has	updates the tracker, then deletes the file	removes it once state: closed

A successful push deletes tmp/issues/<id>.md (and <id>.comments.md), on create and on --update alike. What is in the store is what has not left this machine; everything else is fetched again when it is needed. The rule, its safety conditions, and how the slug survives are /tea:sync's to state.

A closed issue is evicted from the store by issue_evict.py — same trade, one condition more: the work is done and it exists somewhere else. An origin: local issue is never evicted, because there is nowhere to fetch it back from. The store is a working set, not an archive; pull.py <n> fetches a closed issue again whenever it is wanted.

The id never changes across that round trip, which is why depends: in other issues keeps working. That is the format's promise; the mechanism is not.

Language rules

• Issue title: English, imperative mood, no type prefix — the type lives in the label, not the title. Good: Fix tea-guard crash on empty settings file. Bad: fix: crash, [bug] crash, Крашится гвард.
• Section headers: the exact English literals below, as ## headings, in the given order. Do not translate, rename, or reorder them.
• Body prose (text inside sections): Russian.

Label namespaces

Four namespaces classify an issue. Two are exclusive (at most one label from the namespace), two are free-form:

Namespace	Exclusive	Purpose
type/*	yes	What kind of work; primarily its business value. Mandatory, exactly one.
severity/*	yes	Business impact. At most one; apply when the impact is known.
tech/*	no	Technology the issue is bound to. Any number.
comp/*	no	System component of this repo. Any number; no preset — project-specific.

type/* — mandatory, exactly one

Label	Meaning
type/bug	Something behaves incorrectly in existing code
type/task	Implementation of new functionality
type/refactor	Internal restructuring: file moves, architecture; behavior must not change
type/test	Writing or fixing tests
type/feature	Container: several issues delivering one unit of business value
type/draft	Idea captured for later; not ready for work

severity/* — at most one

severity/low, severity/medium, severity/high, severity/showstopper, severity/critical.

tech/* — any number

Technology-bound labels, e.g. tech/sql (pgx, sqlc, sql-migrate — persistent storage), tech/obs (grafana, loki, prometheus, alloy — observability), tech/postgres.

comp/* — any number

Components of this repo's system, e.g. comp/appclick. No preset list — derive from the project.

Label colors are not part of the format: a hex code is how a tracker paints a chip, not what an issue is. They live in skills/sync/scripts/map.py and are applied on push.

Dependencies

depends: in the metadata block is the graph, and it holds ids:

depends: [migrate-schema, add-pool-cfg]

An optional ## Depends on section, placed right after ## Spec, carries the human explanation — one reference per line, with a reason where it helps:

## Depends on
- migrate-schema — нужна схема БД из этого issue
- add-pool-cfg

The section is prose and is passed to and from a tracker unchanged; only depends: is walked when the graph is computed. Keeping them consistent is on you — issue_check.py warns when the section names an id that depends: does not list. Omit the section when there are no dependencies; never write an empty one.

A type/feature container writes the same relation under ## Issues instead (see the template below). Same direction, same rule: every id named there also belongs in that issue's depends:. The warning names whichever of the two sections the reference actually came from.

Draw the graph with issue_tree.py. The reverse direction is a grep:

grep -ln 'depends:.*migrate-schema' tmp/issues/*.md

Shared rules

• ## Summary is always the first section; ## Acceptance criteria is always present (exception: type/draft). These two are the anchors every reader (human or LLM) relies on.
• ## Spec is mandatory in every type. Its value is a repo path (docs/specs/auth.md), a URL, or the literal none when no spec exists. Never omit the section and never invent a link — none is an explicit, valid answer.
• Acceptance criteria are - [ ] checkboxes; each item is an objectively checkable condition, not an aspiration.
• A checkbox is item markup, not a property of one section: - [ ] unticked, - [x] ticked, and it means the same under ## Issues as under ## Acceptance criteria. An item that wraps continues on an indented line and is still one item. A - [ ] inside a ``` code fence is an example of the markup, not state. Tick them with issue_ac.py, which reads the whole body on exactly these rules and rewrites one character; progress (3/7) is counted off the body and is never a metadata field.
• Code references use the path/file.ext:line form; related issues by id.
• Screenshots are allowed but their content must be duplicated as text — an LLM reading these files cannot see images.
• If acceptance criteria grow past ~5 unrelated items, split the issue (or promote it to a type/feature container with child issues).

Template: type/bug

## Summary
Что сломано и где проявляется, одно-два предложения.

## Spec
`docs/specs/auth.md`, URL — или `none`.

## Steps to reproduce
1. …
2. …

## Expected
Что должно было произойти.

## Actual
Что происходит на самом деле: вывод команды, лог.

## Environment
Только релевантное: версии, ОС, конфигурация.

## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] баг не воспроизводится по шагам выше
- [ ] добавлена проверка на регрессию (если применимо)

Template: type/task

## Summary
Что нужно сделать, одно-два предложения.

## Spec
Ссылка или `none`.

## Motivation
Какую проблему пользователя/системы это решает.

## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] проверяемое условие
- [ ] …

## Constraints
Что НЕ входит в объём; технические рамки. (опционально)

Template: type/refactor

## Summary
Что перестраиваем и в каких файлах (`path/file:line`).

## Spec
Ссылка или `none`.

## Motivation
Чем плохо текущее состояние: дублирование, связность, читаемость.

## Invariants
Что НЕ должно измениться: поведение, публичные API, форматы данных.

## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] проверяемое условие (тесты зелёные, старый путь удалён, …)

Template: type/test

## Summary
Что покрываем тестами и где (`path/file:line`).

## Spec
Ссылка или `none`.

## Motivation
Зачем: регрессия после бага, пробел в покрытии, флаки-тест.

## Test cases
- сценарий → ожидаемый результат
- …

## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] перечисленные кейсы покрыты и зелёные
- [ ] тесты проходят в CI

Template: type/feature

A container: one unit of business value delivered by several child issues. Child issues carry their own type/* (task, bug, test, …) and know nothing about the container.

The container depends on its children, never the reverse. Every child id goes in the container's own depends: and, as prose, in its ## Issues section; a child's depends: is for that child's real dependencies and must not point back at the container. Keep implementation detail in the children; the feature body stays at business level.

That direction is not a convention picked at random. "The container is closed when its children are closed" is a dependency relation. "This child belongs to that feature" is a membership relation, and membership has no place in a dependency graph. Pointed the other way the two rules contradict each other: the moment the container listed a child that already depended on it, issue_check.py would report ERROR cycle. With the edge going down, the graph reads as nesting — issue_tree.py draws the container as the root with its children beneath it — and the check is green.

So the container's metadata block carries the children:

depends: [wire-sqlc-appclick, add-pool-cfg]

and its body repeats them for a human:

## Summary
Бизнес-ценность одним-двумя предложениями.

## Spec
Ссылка или `none`.

## Motivation
Какую проблему пользователя/системы это решает.

## Issues
- [ ] wire-sqlc-appclick — краткое описание части
- [ ] add-pool-cfg — краткое описание части

## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] все дочерние issues закрыты
- [ ] проверяемое условие уровня фичи (например, e2e-сценарий работает)

Template: type/draft

A parking spot for ideas that are not fleshed out yet. Minimal structure, no acceptance criteria required. Before implementation starts, a draft MUST be promoted: relabeled to a concrete type and rewritten into that type's template.

## Summary
Идея одним-двумя предложениями.

## Spec
Ссылка или `none` (для драфтов обычно `none`).

## Notes
Свободные заметки: что известно, открытые вопросы, варианты.

Containers beyond type/feature

• Milestone — a set of issues with an optional time bound. Locally it is just the milestone: field; a tracker-side milestone must already exist for a push to attach the issue to it.
• Project — a set of issues tracked by status columns (Backlog, ToDo, InProgress, Ready, Done). Not represented in this format and not reachable through the Gitea API — web UI only.