The store is a working set, not an archive. Until now nothing removed a closed issue from it: #10 put a filter on the write and said so explicitly ("existing store files are not cleaned"), and the migration was never anybody's job. The only way out was rm past every script, followed by rebuilding INDEX.md by hand. issue_evict.py removes <id>.md and every sidecar under that slug for an issue that is state: closed AND carries an origin: naming a tracker, then rebuilds INDEX.md. --dry-run prints and writes nothing at all. Two conditions, and the second one is the whole safety argument. An origin: local issue IS the work — there is no other copy — so it is never evicted, in any state, not even when named on the command line: it is reported and kept. The only files that go are ones whose own metadata says pull.py <n> brings them back, which is the trade push.py already makes when it drops a file the tracker just confirmed. The command lives in the domain layer, and the layering rule decides that rather than convenience: state: and origin: are domain fields and the answer is already on disk, so eviction needs no network, no login and no tea. The domain also gains issue.slug_files — every file the store holds under one slug, which is all_ids' "a slug has no dot in it" read the other way round, and lets the domain remove an issue completely without learning what a comment thread is. skills/sync/scripts/evict.py is the bridge form, and it exists because a local state: is only as fresh as the last pull: an issue closed in the web UI still reads open here. It refreshes state: from Gitea, then calls issue_evict.run — one implementation of "what may be evicted", in the layer that owns the fields it reads. Same gate as push, one step earlier: every candidate's state is fetched before anything is removed, each answer must be an object carrying the number asked about and a state the domain recognizes (confirmed_state, the counterpart of confirmed_number), and a failed or unconfirmed call evicts nothing — not even the candidates whose answers had already arrived, and no refreshed state: is written back either. A candidate is an issue with a gitea: handle; origin: local has none, is never asked about, and is never removed. .remote.json is deliberately not pruned. It is the number -> slug ledger, its entries are supposed to outlive the files they name, and an evicted issue is in exactly the state a pushed one is. AGENTS.md gains the rule the tracker side never wrote down: pull by number fetches an issue in any state — an address is not a query. Eviction does not revoke it, so a closed issue pulled after a cleanup is on disk again, and that is the tracker answering what it was asked. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
tea — Claude Code plugin for the Gitea CLI
A Claude Code plugin that gives Claude a reference for the tea CLI and enforces a hard rule: every tea command runs under the login the operator chose, never one Claude picked.
What it ships
| Piece | What it does |
|---|---|
/tea:auth skill |
Prompts you to pick a Gitea login and pins it to the project |
/tea:issue skill |
Issues as units of work — create, read, grep, validate, walk the dependency graph. Entirely offline |
/tea:sync skill |
Moves issues between the local store and Gitea — pull, push, comment |
/tea:use skill |
Tea CLI reference for everything that is not an issue — loads command docs on demand |
tea-runner agent |
Subagent on Haiku that runs the scripts and reports back a receipt — the mechanical half, off your main context |
tea-guard hook |
PreToolUse hook that blocks or rewrites every tea invocation |
The layering
An issue is a unit of work first and a Gitea row second. Those are two layers, and knowledge flows one way:
skills/issue DOMAIN what an issue is: format, validation, dependency graph
▲ offline — no tracker, no network, stdlib only
│ imports
skills/sync BRIDGE md <-> Gitea JSON, then over the wire
▲
│ calls
tea-runner EXECUTION runs the scripts, reports a receipt — no opinions
Delete skills/sync and the domain layer keeps working — issues that live only
on your machine are first-class, not drafts waiting to be uploaded. That is the
point of the split: you can plan, write, validate, and track work without a
tracker, and publish only what you choose to.
Prerequisites
- Claude Code — CLI, desktop app, or IDE extension
- Python 3 — required by the
tea-guardhook (python3must be on$PATH) tea— Gitea's official CLI. Install withbrew install tea(macOS) or from gitea.com/gitea/tea/releases- At least one login configured:
tea logins add(interactive — run it in a terminal, not via Claude)
Installation
This is a Claude Code plugin — install it through the plugin marketplace, not by hand-editing settings.json.
-
Register this repo as a marketplace:
/plugin marketplace add https://git.noodles.cam/claude-skills/tea.gitAlready have a local clone? Point at the directory instead:
/plugin marketplace add /path/to/tea -
Install the plugin:
/plugin install tea@tea
The skills (/tea:auth, /tea:issue, /tea:sync, /tea:use) and the tea-guard hook load immediately. Use /plugin to enable, disable, or update it later.
The marketplace registration is written to
extraKnownMarketplacesand the plugin toenabledPluginsin your settings automatically — you don't edit those by hand. There is no top-level"plugins"settings key; if you've added one from older instructions, remove it.
First use
Run /tea:auth once per project. Claude will list your available Gitea logins and ask you to pick one. The choice is written to .claude/settings.local.json and takes effect immediately — no restart needed.
/tea:auth
After that, just ask Claude to do something with issues or Gitea — it loads the
right skill automatically. /tea:auth is only needed for the tracker side;
/tea:issue works without any login at all.
How the login guard works
Every tea invocation Claude writes must carry the literal placeholder --login "$GITEA_LOGIN". The tea-guard hook intercepts the Bash call before it runs, looks up the pinned login from .claude/settings.local.json, and rewrites the command to use it.
Claude is blocked from:
- running
teawithout--loginat all - naming a login itself (e.g.
--login myaccount) - using any variable other than
$GITEA_LOGIN
This prevents silent fallback to the machine's default login (often a personal account) when working in a project that belongs to a different identity.
tea logins list and tea --version / --help are exempt — they don't touch Gitea data.
The tea-runner agent
The skills carry meaning; the scripts carry work. tea-runner is a subagent on
Haiku that does the second half in its own context and hands back a receipt —
what ran, what it touched, what failed, verbatim.
Delegate a batch: pull a milestone and rebuild the index, push the three
issues you just wrote, bootstrap the label set, post a comment from a file you
prepared. Spawning it for a single pull.py 42 costs more than running the
command yourself; the saving is in the loop, the retry, and reading somebody
else's stderr.
It cannot decide anything. No Edit, no Write, no --force, no closing or
retitling, no raw tea, no pushing beyond the set it was handed. A missing
type, a failed validation, an unpushed dependency come back as a question, not
as a guess. The tea-guard hook applies to it exactly as it does to the main
session — the pinned login is enforced on every call it makes.
Project layout
.claude-plugin/
plugin.json plugin manifest
marketplace.json marketplace catalog (makes `/plugin install` work)
agents/
tea-runner.md subagent (Haiku) that executes the scripts
hooks/
hooks.json registers the PreToolUse hook
tea-guard.sh the guard (Python 3, no deps)
skills/
auth/SKILL.md /tea:auth skill
issue/ /tea:issue — the domain layer, offline
SKILL.md
references/format.md canonical issue format (identity, types, templates)
scripts/ Python 3, stdlib only, no network:
issue.py domain module: slug identity, parse/render,
validation, taxonomy, dependency graph,
body checkboxes
issue_new.py create a local issue from its type template
issue_check.py validate against the format
issue_ac.py list the body's checkboxes; tick one
issue_tree.py draw the dependency graph
issue_index.py rebuild tmp/issues/INDEX.md
sync/ /tea:sync — the bridge to Gitea
SKILL.md
scripts/
map.py md <-> Gitea JSON, pure functions, no I/O
_gitea.py transport: login pin, tea api, pagination, filters
pull.py Gitea -> tmp/issues/
push.py tmp/issues/ -> Gitea, then drops the local file
remote.py discovery listing to stdout
comment.py post or edit a comment
use/ /tea:use — tea CLI reference (non-issue entities)
SKILL.md
references/tea/ command docs
Local issue store
Issues live in tmp/issues/ (gitignore it) as flat markdown with one metadata
field per line — so grep -l 'labels:.*type/bug' tmp/issues/*.md works without
a parser.
An origin: local file is the issue — the store, and the only copy.
Anything with origin: gitea is a working copy of something the tracker
already has, and it is deleted as soon as a push confirms the tracker is up to
date:
- Identity is a slug (
wire-sqlc-appclick.md), never a tracker number. Numbers live in agitea:field. origin: localis a complete state. An issue that never leaves your machine is valid and finished — but it is not permanent: pushing ends it.- A successful push deletes the local file (
--updatetoo) and prints the number and URL it now lives at. Only after a confirmed response: a failed call leaves the file exactly where it was. Get it back withpull.py <n>— same slug, samedepends:, even after a rename in Gitea. - Pulling overwrites the body: a fetch, not a merge. It is also how a pushed issue comes back.
- Nothing tracks drift, and there is no second copy to drift. A file that is still here has not been pushed.