Commit Graph

70 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
naudachu a685f23bc0 test: anchor the release fixtures at both ends of the walk
`harmless` pointed CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR at an empty temp directory and left the
working directory where `go test` put it. The walk has two anchors, so the
second one carried the fixture back up into this repository, which has a
`.kettle/` marker of its own — gitignored, and therefore present in every
developer's checkout and in no clone. The run resolved `login: noodles` from it
and then failed against the fixture's empty config home.

TestRunPublishesFromTheEnvironmentWithNoProjectInSight is precisely the test
that is about resolving nothing at all, and it passed only while nobody had run
`kettle init` here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
v0.0.1
2026-08-12 11:45:51 +05:00
naudachu 4058cf5a4e chore: ignore the issue store in this repository
`kettle init` adds this line itself. It is here because this repository now
tracks its own issues with the binary it ships, which is the first real use of
either.

An `origin: local` issue is the only copy of that work, so what goes into a
shared history is the operator's call rather than the tool's — the line is a
default, not a rule, and dropping it is a legitimate choice.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 01:27:19 +05:00
naudachu 01fb5a2703 feat: publish releases with this repository's own SDK code
There is no CI: the instance has no act_runner and none is planned, so releases
are cut by hand. That makes `make check` the only thing standing between a
mistake and the tracker, and it is one command: gofmt, vet, the suite with the
cache defeated, `go mod verify`, a vendored build, and `kettle gen skills
--check`. The last one is the invariant worth having — the plugin's SKILL.md
command reference is generated from the binary's registry, so a flag that
changed cannot ship with documentation that recommends the old one.

`cli/cmd/release` publishes to Gitea using the same SDK the binary already
vendors, which is a pleasing thing to be able to say: nothing third-party
handles the artifacts. It is a second binary rather than a `kettle` subcommand
on purpose — `kettle`'s command tree is what generates the plugin's skills, so a
verb there ships to every operator, and publishing a release is build
infrastructure. It is idempotent end to end: an existing release for the tag is
reused, an asset of the same name is replaced rather than doubled, and a retried
run converges instead of duplicating.

`make release` refuses three things, each with its own message: a dirty working
tree, a TAG that is not what `git describe` reports, and a tag the remote does
not have. A release built from uncommitted code is unreproducible and nobody
finds out until they need to reproduce it.

`kettle version` reports the stamp, the toolchain and the VCS revision. The
default is `dev`, and a hand build says so and means it — a binary out of
somebody's working tree is not a release and must not claim to be one.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 01:01:27 +05:00
naudachu ec0a1893b7 docs: repoint the doc comments at the marker they describe
The store moved to `.kettle/` when the binary replaced the plugin's scripts, but
six doc comments in the domain and the project layer still showed `.tea/` paths
in their examples. The code was right and the prose was a version behind, which
is the failure mode worth catching early: these are the comments somebody reads
to learn where the store IS.

The `.tea/` that remain are the ones that mean it — the legacy migration list
and the tests that exercise it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 00:20:20 +05:00
naudachu e628ad6fd9 refactor!: rewire the plugin onto the kettle binary, and rename it
BREAKING: the plugin is `kettle`, not `tea`, and its commands are `/kettle:*`.
It also now needs a binary on PATH that it did not need before; the README and
every skill say how to get one and what a missing one looks like.

The plugin was 3800 lines of Python doing what a compiled binary does better,
and the name pointed at a tool that no longer takes part: `tea` is Gitea's CLI,
and since the transport moved into the binary nothing here shells out to it for
issues at all. A plugin named after it was going to keep suggesting otherwise.

Deleted: 19 scripts, the 14-file unittest suite, and the tea-guard hook. The
guard blocked any `tea` invocation that would run under a login the model picked
instead of the operator; the binary holds its own credentials and reads the
pinned login out of the project's own config, so that failure is no longer
expressible and there is nothing left to police. agents-sync stays — it is about
AGENTS.md symlinks and has nothing to do with any of this.

What the plugin keeps is what only a plugin can carry: the rules an operator
states and a binary cannot enforce. `init` still refuses to run inside a linked
worktree and still may not be model-invoked, because which directory is the
project is a statement a person makes. The issue format reference stays here and
stays the source of truth. The runner subagent is still for batches and still
may not decide what an issue says.

The command reference in the issue, sync and project skills is GENERATED from
the binary's own command registry, between markers, so a flag that changed
cannot ship with a skill that recommends the old one. `kettle gen skills
--check` exits non-zero when they drift. The generator owns the region and
nothing outside it: the frontmatter description, which is what decides whether a
skill loads at all, stays hand-written.

`use` survives and is the one place `tea` is still named — for releases,
webhooks and actions, which kettle does not cover. Its instruction to write
`--login "$GITEA_LOGIN"` and let the hook substitute the pin was true until this
commit and is now rewritten: `tea` keeps its own configuration, kettle keeps
its own, and configuring one configures nothing in the other.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-12 00:04:44 +05:00
naudachu 1239fdee70 refactor: move the transport onto the official Gitea SDK
The transport was hand-rolled net/http against the REST API. The payload shapes
were ours, in internal/wire, which meant every field Gitea learned was a field
somebody here had to notice; and "does this instance have issue dependencies?"
had to be guessed from a status code, because a 404 from a missing route and a
404 from a missing issue look alike.

The SDK settles both. The shapes are maintained by the people who maintain the
server, and the client negotiates the server's version when it is built, so the
dependency endpoint is now gated on `>= 1.20.0` — verified against the release
where the route appears, not assumed. Below the gate nothing is requested at all.

internal/wire keeps what the SDK has no answer for: addressing. The SDK takes an
owner, a name and an int64 and never parses, while `42`, `#42`, `owner/repo#42`
and an issue URL are four spellings of one address, all four are what somebody
has in hand, and Key is what the ledger is keyed by. The payload structs go.

Four things that had to survive the move, and did:

- request bodies still land in .kettle/payload/, now via an http.RoundTripper on
  the client the SDK is given — which is better than before, because it files
  every request rather than the ones a call site remembered to name;
- errors still carry the HTTP status AND the response body, and a decode failure
  on a 2xx is deliberately not an APIError, so the dependency probe cannot read
  a bad decode as "feature missing";
- the number -> slug ledger is untouched, entries still outlive the files they
  name;
- Client.For(repo) still re-points at another repository for one call.

What it cost, written down in AGENTS.md where it happened. internal/mapping's
layering test was a fact about the import graph — nothing in its closure could
open a socket — and the SDK ships its types and its client in one package, so
the test now asserts what is still true: the bridge performs no I/O, checked on
direct imports plus a grep for time.Now. A run makes one extra request before it
does anything. Gitea's issue edit endpoint carries no labels, so a push whose
labels changed needs a second call; push makes it and says so. go.mod requires
go 1.26, which the SDK sets and which is now the floor for building this binary.

internal/issue and internal/project are byte-identical. The domain did not
notice, which is the whole argument for the layering.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 19:29:38 +05:00
naudachu 9480e48312 feat: add the kettle CLI, replacing the plugin's Python scripts
The plugin resolved its issue store from `__file__`, which put it inside a
versioned plugin cache: issues written from one project were invisible from the
next, and `origin: local` files — the only copy of that work by definition —
were stranded a version bump at a time. The walk that answers "which directory
is the project" was written three times over, and in a linked worktree the three
disagreed. Both are runtime failures rather than logic ones, so the fix is a
compiled binary: one walk, imported rather than re-derived, and a layering rule
the build graph enforces instead of a grep.

Seven packages, knowledge flowing one way. `project` answers which directory is
the project and depends on nothing. `issue` is the domain — format, taxonomy,
validation, checkboxes, dependency graph, the store, eviction — offline, with no
tracker in it. `wire` holds the protocol shapes. `gitea` is the transport,
`mapping` the bridge, `config` the credentials, `cmd` the command tree. Four
tests hold the boundaries, each failing on a real mistake rather than a naming
convention.

The marker moves to `.kettle/` and the login pin moves out of the harness's
settings file into `.kettle/config.yaml`, which pins a login by NAME; the tokens
live in one file per machine, mode 0600, outside every working tree. That
retires the PreToolUse guard hook entirely — the binary holds its own
credentials, so a command running under a login nobody chose is not expressible
rather than caught.

`kettle init` migrates an older `tmp/issues` or `.tea/issues` store in, as a
move: a store left behind at an old path is one somebody edits by accident
months later.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 19:05:39 +05:00
naudachu fb5445915f fix: resolve the issue store from the project, not the plugin
`issue.store_root` and `_gitea.PAYLOAD_ROOT` were anchored on `__file__`, on
the reasoning that where an installation keeps its files is a fact about the
installation. That holds for an installation and not for a store.

Installed, the plugin therefore resolved every project's issues inside its own
directory — and a plugin cache is versioned, so the store moved on each
update:

    ~/.claude/plugins/cache/tea/tea/2.0.0/tmp/issues   5 files, 2 origin: local
    ~/.claude/plugins/cache/tea/tea/2.1.0/tmp/issues   12 files
    ~/.claude/plugins/cache/claude-skills/tea/2.2.0/   empty, the current one

Issues written from one project were invisible from the next, and an `origin:
local` file — which IS the issue, the only copy — was stranded a version bump
at a time. Two of them were.

The store is a fact about the project, exactly as the login pin is. So the
anchor is now an explicit marker an operator creates, `.tea/`, searched for up
from $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR and then cwd — the pin's order, so the two cannot
disagree about which project this is. Inferred markers were tried and are worse
than useless here: `.git` is in every clone including this plugin's own, and
the agents-sync hook writes an AGENTS.md next to every AGENTS.md, so the plugin
root always carried one and cwd never got a turn.

With no marker anywhere, `store_root()` is None and every entry point reports
which directories it searched. A store in a plausible-looking directory is the
failure this replaces, so nothing falls back to one.

- `.tea/` holds the store and the transport's scratchpad: `.tea/issues`,
  `.tea/payload`. One marker, one walk, one gitignore line.
- `issue_init.py` creates it, moves an old `tmp/issues` store in rather than
  copying, adds `.tea/` to `.gitignore`, and refuses to pick a winner when both
  sides hold the same file name.
- A linked worktree has no marker — it is gitignored — and reaches the main
  checkout's store by the hop the pin already took.
- `parents`, `gitdir_of` and `main_worktree` move from `pin.py` into the domain
  and `pin.py` imports them. The domain depends on nothing, so it is the layer
  all three callers can borrow from, and the walk stays written once: the
  guard, the transport and the store cannot disagree about a directory.

The suite stopped copying the script layers into its fixtures. That is what hid
this: with the scripts inside the fixture, the installation and the project
were the same directory. They are now deliberately far apart, and a regression
test asserts the plugin tree gains no files when commands run against a project
somewhere else.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 13:38:39 +05:00
naudachu 27e4b6b1da merge: unify tdl and tea into one marketplace 2026-08-11 00:52:45 +05:00
naudachu 83f73c5cea refactor: turn the repo into a two-plugin marketplace
tea and tdl were two repositories, each carrying its own
.claude-plugin/marketplace.json — two marketplaces to register for what
is one collection. Fold them into one.

The repo root is now the marketplace and nothing else: a single
.claude-plugin/marketplace.json whose entries point at ./plugins/tea and
./plugins/tdl. A plugin's root is its own directory under plugins/, so
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} still resolves inside it and every path a plugin
uses stays relative to itself — the hooks and the test roots needed no
adjustment beyond the move.

tea's files move with git mv, so its history and blame follow. tdl
arrives as a plain copy; its history stays in claude-skills/threedotslab.

test_payload_root asserted `tmp/` was ignored by REPO/.gitignore. The
rule is that tmp/ is ignored, not which file says so, and git reads every
.gitignore on the way up — so the test now walks up to the repo root the
same way git does.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-11 00:25:28 +05:00
naudachu 23f78beafb merge: drop the wiki and page layers 2026-08-10 22:31:09 +05:00
naudachu 5a8bd1c299 refactor!: drop the wiki and page layers
The plugin is issues and nothing else now. `skills/page` (the page-tree
domain) and `skills/wiki` (its bridge to a Gitea wiki) are gone, and
with them the issue domain's `wiki:` field — page titles were the only
thing that tied the two domains together, and a field the tracker has
no column for never came back from a pull anyway.

What is left is the shape AGENTS.md already claimed for the rest of the
repo: one domain, one bridge, one transport. The docs, the plugin
manifest, and tea-runner's skill table now say so too, and
test_payload_root walks the one script directory that remains.

Also removes openspec/config.yaml; nothing in the repo referenced it.

378 tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 22:29:55 +05:00
naudachu 81119a3bd9 merge: bring the README layout and the branch claim back to the code 2026-08-10 20:07:23 +05:00
naudachu f97ac952f7 merge: separate the API-only flags from the ones needing a checkout 2026-08-10 20:07:23 +05:00
naudachu 493a787940 merge: implement the wiki field in the issue domain 2026-08-10 20:07:08 +05:00
naudachu 7ab967bfaa merge: guard the CLI command, not the word 2026-08-10 20:06:52 +05:00
naudachu edb2f5a627 docs: bring the README layout and the branch claim back to the code
README described a three-skill plugin that ships six. skills/page and
skills/wiki were absent from What it ships and from the project tree, so
/tea:page and /tea:wiki could not be discovered from the front page at
all; labels.py, close.py, evict.py, issue_evict.py, pin.py and the
agents-sync hook were missing from the tree too. Layout now matches
AGENTS.md, and says which of the two is authoritative.

The sync skill promised that push writes the computed branch back into
the issue file. It cannot: a successful push deletes the file, which
push.py:260-271 and its docstring already said. The paragraph now says
what happens instead — the ref goes up, and the branch comes back on the
next pull, from the tracker. The three claims around it were correct and
are kept.

Closes #27
Closes #31

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 20:03:27 +05:00
naudachu 62027db76c docs: separate the API-only flags from the ones needing a checkout
Two flags in the reference said one thing and did another.

`-o` was listed as a global output-format flag and the Tips section
recommended `-o json` without qualification. On `tea api` it is a file
name: `-o json` writes the body to a file called json and leaves stdout
empty, so the next parse fails with a JSONDecodeError that looks like a
server refusal. Scoped to entity commands, and api's meaning named in
all three places that mention it.

`--repo owner/repo` was documented as a general substitute for standing
in a checkout. For `pulls create`, `pulls checkout` and `pulls clean` it
is not: the slug is rejected with 'local repository required', advice
that reads like the flag was missing. Verified from outside any repo —
those three refuse a slug and accept a path, while pulls list,
milestones, releases and times take the slug from anywhere. All three
working forms are written down, including the git-worktree one (point
--repo at the main checkout) and the api fallback.

Closes #35
Closes #28

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 20:00:13 +05:00
naudachu 9479babfe9 feat: implement the wiki field in the issue domain
format.md listed `wiki:` among the domain fields, between depends and
origin, and issue.py had never heard of it. The field fell into extra and
rendered with the foreign keys — sorted in after the sync fields, which
the same document forbids one line below the table. Written without
brackets it parsed as a single string, and nothing but a text editor
could set it.

Implemented rather than de-documented: page_ls.py --titles already
prints these titles, so the field was designed and only unwired.
DOMAIN_KEYS and LIST_KEYS learn it, Issue carries it, and issue_new.py
gets a repeatable --wiki flag.

Titles only, as the format says: no path, no sub_url, no lookup. The
tracker has no field for it, so it is never sent and a pull does not
bring it back — format.md now says so.

Closes #32

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 19:55:10 +05:00
naudachu e330a11e8f fix: guard the tea command, not the word tea
The guard tested whether the command string contained `tea` between
whitespace. In a repository whose subject is the CLI, that blocked prose:
an issue title, a commit message quoting a raw call, `grep -rn " tea "`
and `echo tea`. The block message told the operator to add --login to
git commit, which cannot be done — the only way past was to reword the
sentence.

The command is now tokenized (heredoc bodies dropped, line continuations
folded, backticks and newlines treated as boundaries) and only words in
command position count: the first word, and the first after a shell
operator, past VAR=value assignments and prefix words. Quoting is what
saves the prose — a title is one token, and a token is never a command.

Every invocation in the line is checked and rewritten, not just the
first: a half-rewritten line left the second call with an unset variable
and no login. The whitelist is now per-invocation too, so quoting
"tea logins list" beside a real call no longer launders it.

An untokenizable line (unbalanced quotes) falls back to the old
substring test, which over-matches and therefore blocks.

Closes #29

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 19:49:38 +05:00
naudachu bf0936526d init openspec 2026-08-10 19:37:08 +05:00
claude f7cffd7c48 merge: evict closed issues from the local store 2026-08-10 13:32:50 +00:00
naudachu e6b4cf773c Merge origin/main into feat/evict-closed-issues
Three doc conflicts, all unions: the script lists in AGENTS.md and the runner
gain both close.py and evict.py, and the sync skill keeps both the closing and
the evicting sections. Rule 4 of the runner is rewritten once to carry both
halves — closing is now a script it may run on named ids, retitling and remote
deletion stay forbidden, and the two allowed local deletions (push's own, and
eviction) are listed together.
2026-08-10 18:32:39 +05:00
claude 17567cd6a2 merge: close issues through a script 2026-08-10 13:29:36 +00:00
naudachu f5977fa4fc Merge origin/main into feat/close-script
Two conflicts git could see (AGENTS.md, skills/sync/SKILL.md) and one it could
not: the payload-root change removed api()'s out_root parameter, so close.py
stops passing it, and its payload test now asserts PAYLOAD_ROOT instead of the
deleted PAYLOAD_DIR.
2026-08-10 18:29:25 +05:00
claude 74a0e3b173 merge: resolve the login pin from a git worktree 2026-08-10 13:25:14 +00:00
naudachu bb964d5a55 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into fix/worktree-login-pin 2026-08-10 18:24:45 +05:00
claude 40016e06f2 merge: keep request payloads out of the issue store 2026-08-10 13:24:35 +00:00
naudachu 2a8da81359 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into fix/no-store-for-label-payloads
# Conflicts:
#	skills/sync/scripts/_gitea.py
2026-08-10 18:23:39 +05:00
claude c18b16a14b merge: follow dependencies on every pull by default 2026-08-10 13:22:45 +00:00
claude cfbd6e5ddb merge: apply --limit to the write, not to the selection 2026-08-10 13:21:55 +00:00
naudachu 1d7abc11ae fix: resolve the login pin from a git worktree
`_gitea.require_login` walked up from CWD and nowhere else. A worktree is a
sibling of the main checkout, not a descendant, and `settings.local.json` is
untracked — so the pin lives in the main checkout only, is not on the
worktree's parent chain, and the whole tracker half of the plugin died there
with "no login pinned". In the same directory the guard resolved it fine,
because it had a search of its own: one order, written twice, disagreeing.

It is written once now, in skills/auth/scripts/pin.py, and both callers import
it — the transport and hooks/tea-guard.sh. $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR, then a hint the
caller supplies (the hook passes its payload's cwd), then the current
directory; each searched up its parent chain, and only if that finds nothing,
across into the main working tree of a linked worktree met on the way, reached
by reading `gitdir:` out of the `.git` FILE and following `commondir`. No
subprocess — a PreToolUse hook runs before every Bash call and must not fork to
answer this.

The search still starts at the working directory and never at `__file__`,
deliberately asymmetric with `issue.store_root` and `_gitea.PAYLOAD_ROOT`.
Where an installation keeps its files is a fact about the installation; whose
login a project runs under is a fact about the project, and a plugin pointed at
somebody else's tree must not answer that from its own directory. pin.py says
so in as many words, so the next reader does not "fix" the inconsistency.

Two consequences fall out of it. `/tea:auth` no longer has any reason to run
inside a worktree, so no second pin lands in a directory that is deleted with
the branch — the skill now says to write it beside the common `.git`. And the
scripts can run where the work is: the workaround the bug forced, cwd in the
main checkout, made push.py send that checkout's branch as `ref`, which is the
one thing `branch:` exists to record.

tests/test_login_pin.py holds both halves: the hop against a hand-built layout
and against a real `git worktree add`, a run from the worktree finding the
login, no pin anywhere still erroring, the scripts' own directory not becoming
a source, `ref` coming out as the worktree's branch, and the hook and a script
answering the same directory alike. Two mechanical checks keep the callers from
growing a second copy of the walk. Three existing fixtures now copy
skills/auth/scripts, which the transport imports.

Refs #24.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 18:14:18 +05:00
naudachu a2e9a88186 feat: follow dependencies on every pull by default
`depends:` was filled and blockers were pulled only under `--deps`, so the
plain `pull.py <n>` — the only way to get a pushed issue back — answered
with a file whose graph was empty and an `issue_tree.py` that drew it as a
root with no blockers. The edge was not lost, but it was not asked for, and
it cannot be recovered locally: `map.from_api` writes slugs into the
`## Depends on` prose and never `#N`, so Gitea's native graph is the only
source there is.

A pull now returns the unit of work — the issue and what blocks it. `--deps`
stays accepted and does nothing, so existing calls and /tea:sync's tables
keep working; `--no-deps` is the way out and spends no request on either
half.

The cost is accepted and stated rather than hidden. The native links are now
fetched ONCE per issue instead of twice (they both fill `depends:` and steer
the walk), and only for an issue that lands in the store — a closed one that
filter mode drops no longer drags its blockers in behind it. That makes the
number quotable, and pull.py's docstring quotes it: a milestone of 50 open
issues costs one list request plus 50, where it used to cost one. In filter
mode a blocker no filter selected still lands in the store and still sits
outside `--limit`, deliberately, and both are documented; the exception is a
closed blocker, dropped like any other closed issue with the edge to it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 17:41:27 +05:00
naudachu 627df76812 test: keep the payload root out of the developer's tree
One test stubs the transport a layer below `api()` — at `subprocess`, to
exercise the path a 422 really takes — so it reaches the real payload
write. That used to land in the test's own temp store, because the caller
named the directory; now the directory is `_gitea.PAYLOAD_ROOT`, resolved
from the module's location, and the file appeared in the developer's
`tmp/payload/`.

`StoreTestCase` patches `PAYLOAD_ROOT` to its fixture alongside the other
seams, and the rule in AGENTS.md gains the third directory a test must
not write to.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 17:32:35 +05:00
naudachu 2f82b501bd feat: evict closed issues from the local store
The store is a working set, not an archive. Until now nothing removed a
closed issue from it: #10 put a filter on the write and said so explicitly
("existing store files are not cleaned"), and the migration was never
anybody's job. The only way out was rm past every script, followed by
rebuilding INDEX.md by hand.

issue_evict.py removes <id>.md and every sidecar under that slug for an
issue that is state: closed AND carries an origin: naming a tracker, then
rebuilds INDEX.md. --dry-run prints and writes nothing at all.

Two conditions, and the second one is the whole safety argument. An
origin: local issue IS the work — there is no other copy — so it is never
evicted, in any state, not even when named on the command line: it is
reported and kept. The only files that go are ones whose own metadata says
pull.py <n> brings them back, which is the trade push.py already makes
when it drops a file the tracker just confirmed.

The command lives in the domain layer, and the layering rule decides that
rather than convenience: state: and origin: are domain fields and the
answer is already on disk, so eviction needs no network, no login and no
tea. The domain also gains issue.slug_files — every file the store holds
under one slug, which is all_ids' "a slug has no dot in it" read the other
way round, and lets the domain remove an issue completely without learning
what a comment thread is.

skills/sync/scripts/evict.py is the bridge form, and it exists because a
local state: is only as fresh as the last pull: an issue closed in the web
UI still reads open here. It refreshes state: from Gitea, then calls
issue_evict.run — one implementation of "what may be evicted", in the
layer that owns the fields it reads. Same gate as push, one step earlier:
every candidate's state is fetched before anything is removed, each answer
must be an object carrying the number asked about and a state the domain
recognizes (confirmed_state, the counterpart of confirmed_number), and a
failed or unconfirmed call evicts nothing — not even the candidates whose
answers had already arrived, and no refreshed state: is written back
either. A candidate is an issue with a gitea: handle; origin: local has
none, is never asked about, and is never removed.

.remote.json is deliberately not pruned. It is the number -> slug ledger,
its entries are supposed to outlive the files they name, and an evicted
issue is in exactly the state a pushed one is.

AGENTS.md gains the rule the tracker side never wrote down: pull by number
fetches an issue in any state — an address is not a query. Eviction does
not revoke it, so a closed issue pulled after a cleanup is on disk again,
and that is the tracker answering what it was asked.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 17:28:13 +05:00
naudachu 9679e2c000 feat: close issues through a script
Closing was the last regular tracker operation with no script behind it.
The only way to move state: was a raw `tea api -X PATCH` against
repos/OWNER/REPO/issues/N with a hand-written body, which spells out the
owner, the repo and the request shape — the three things _gitea.py exists
to hide — and which needs a Bash(tea api *) permission wide enough to
cover -X DELETE on the repository.

close.py takes explicit ids, one or many, as a local slug or as any key
form pull.py accepts (42, #42, owner/repo#42, a URL). A slug resolves
through its gitea: field while the file is there and through .remote.json
after push has dropped it, so an issue with no local copy is still
closeable by name. --reopen is the same run backwards.

State only: the payload carries state and nothing else. Closing is not an
edit; editing stays pull -> change -> push --update. No --milestone and
no --label either — which issues are finished is a judgement about
content, and this only carries one out, one named id at a time.

An origin: local issue is refused: it is not in the tracker, so there is
no state there to change, and the error names the id rather than quietly
editing one field of a local file. Every argument is resolved before
anything is sent, so a typo in the third id cannot leave the first two
closed, and one run addresses one repo — a key that names its own is sent
there instead of to whatever repo the CWD happens to be in.

The local file is written only after the tracker confirmed this write: an
object carrying the number that was PATCHed, in the state that was asked
for (close.confirmed). A non-2xx, a transport that would not run, an
answer for another issue, a 200 that still says open — the run stops and
the file is byte for byte what it was. --dry-run prints the same lines,
makes no request at all and needs no pinned login.

tea-runner rule 4 narrows accordingly: closing was forbidden because
nothing but a raw call could do it, not because it is dangerous. It may
now close the ids the caller named, and no others; deleting and retitling
stay forbidden.

tests/test_close.py stubs the transport at _gitea.api and, for the
non-2xx path, one layer lower at _gitea.subprocess so a CLI that exits 1
is proved end to end. 286 tests, no network, no tmp/issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 17:27:22 +05:00
naudachu 596cf853e8 fix: keep request payloads out of the issue store
`labels.py` handed `_gitea.api` the issue store as a place to put the
request file, and on a checkout without a store that quietly created
`tmp/issues/.payload/`. Bootstrapping a repository's labels touches no
issue at all, so the one rule the store has — nothing materializes it as
a side effect of a write — was broken by an operation that has no
business knowing the store exists.

Where a request body goes was never the caller's decision to make. It is
now the transport's: `tmp/payload/`, resolved from `_gitea.py`'s own
location the way both domains resolve theirs, so every caller — sync and
wiki alike — writes to one directory whatever it was invoked from, and
`out_root` is gone from `api`, `add_dependency` and all six call sites.
The directory is created by the first write of a run and not before: a
`--dry-run` leaves nothing behind. `tmp/` is already gitignored.

The name carries the distinction the old path lost. A store holds the
only copy of something; this holds debris kept for a retry or a
post-mortem, and deleting it costs nothing. A dotdir sitting among an
issue's files claimed otherwise, and `ls tmp/issues` started lying about
what existed.

tests/test_payload_root.py runs the real `labels.py` in a throwaway repo
against a fake `tea` on PATH: no store appears, the payloads land in
tmp/payload/, a dry run writes nothing, and a run from a subdirectory
still resolves to the repo root. Two source checks keep the callers from
drifting apart again.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 17:25:33 +05:00
naudachu bea3735e47 fix: apply --limit to the write, not to the selection
pull.py's docstring said "the limit is on the write, not on the
selection", and the code did the opposite: `list_issues` truncated the
payload list to `limit`, and pull.py dropped the closed ones after that.
A milestone whose first issues are closed therefore answered `--limit 20`
with twelve files, and the only statement about the behavior anywhere was
the false one.

The limit now counts what the run leaves in the store. `list_issues`
takes a `keep` predicate, pages keep arriving until `limit` payloads have
satisfied it, and the ones that did not are still returned — they were
enumerated, and pull.py still reports them as "N closed, not stored".
What `keep` means stays the caller's business; the transport only counts.
pull.py hands it `lands_in_store`, which is the same test the walk itself
applies: a closed issue counts only when the store already has it, since
that one is refreshed rather than dropped.

Pagination is the other half, and it cuts both ways. `paginate` is now a
thin wrapper over a new `pages` generator, so the page after the one that
fills the budget is never requested. In the other direction "fetch until
N are kept" is "fetch the whole tracker" on a filter that matches mostly
closed issues, so a keep-bounded read scans at most PAGE_SLACK times the
pages the limit would need if nothing were dropped, then warns on stderr
and returns short. Raising --limit raises that ceiling with it. --deps is
outside the count: a dependency is followed because an issue named it.

remote.py keeps the old meaning and now says so in as many words — it
writes nothing, so there is no write for a limit to bound, and its
--limit caps the listing, closed issues included. Same flag, two jobs,
documented in both scripts and in the skill's command table.

Also refuses `--limit 0` instead of dividing by the page size and
raising ZeroDivisionError.

tests/test_pull_limit.py stubs the transport with a fake that serves
`page=`/`limit=` itself, so the request pattern is observed rather than
assumed: exactly N files out of a half-closed selection, the second page
fetched and the third not, the scan stopping at the budget with a
warning, and remote.py's listing unchanged. 251 tests, no network.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 17:23:12 +05:00
naudachu 2ac301550e merge: drop the local copy after a successful push
# Conflicts:
#	AGENTS.md
#	agents/tea-runner.md
2026-08-10 16:40:21 +05:00
naudachu e629d14585 feat: drop the local copy after a successful push
Gitea becomes the source of truth. Once a push is confirmed, push.py
deletes tmp/issues/<id>.md and <id>.comments.md and prints the number and
URL the issue now lives at; the current state is obtained by pulling
again rather than by reconciling. --update follows the same rule, with no
exception: what is local is what has not left.

This reverses three statements AGENTS.md used to make, and rewriting them
is part of the change:

  - "tmp/issues/ is the store, not a cache of Gitea" — it is both, split
    by origin:. An origin: local file is the only copy of the work; an
    origin: gitea file is a deletable working copy.
  - "Pushing is additive: the file is never deleted" — it is deleted.
  - "origin: local is a durable state" — complete, but not durable:
    pushing ends it.

Slug stability, which the format promises for the life of an issue, can
no longer rest on a file push is about to delete. The slug goes up in the
body as a hidden marker, <!-- tea:id <slug> -->, on the first line:
map.to_payload strips every marker and prepends exactly one, map.from_api
strips every marker on the way down, so the local file never holds one
and a body cannot accumulate them however many round trips it makes. The
marker survives a rename in the web UI, a lost .remote.json, a fresh
clone and another machine — none of which a local index does.

Deletion is the last thing that happens to an issue and only after the
transport returned, the answer carried a positive integer number (and, on
--update, the number that was PATCHed — push.confirmed_number), and
.remote.json was written. A raised transport, a non-2xx, an empty or
mismatched body each leave the file on disk and stop the run.

.remote.json is no longer "only an index over the files": its entries now
deliberately outlive them, so it is the local number -> slug ledger and
rebuild_map merges into it instead of reconstructing it from files that
may be gone. It stays recoverable, from the markers in Gitea rather than
from the files. push.dep_state reads it too, so a blocker whose file an
earlier push dropped still gets its native dependency link.

Also fixes a pre-existing bug the new tests hit: issue.all_ids treated
<id>.comments.md as an issue called "<id>.comments", so a bare push.py in
a store holding pulled threads tried to file a comment thread as a unit
of work. A slug has no dot in it.

tests/test_drop_after_push.py covers the round trip (push -> gone -> pull
-> identical in slug, depends: and body), the marker's algebra, and every
failure path separately. test_push_dependencies.py is updated where it
encoded the old "never deleted" contract. 183 tests, no network.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 16:38:16 +05:00
naudachu 1815d91cdf feat: discussion artifacts as wiki pages, in two new layers
A discussion leaves behind a directory of markdown somewhere outside this
repo, and the only durable home for it is the Gitea wiki. Getting it
there by hand means re-deriving the same three things every time: what
each file should be called, where it goes, and whether the page already
exists. Two skills wrap that, along the split the repo already uses.

`skills/page` is domain, offline, stdlib-only, and knows nothing about
Gitea. It imports a directory into a space under `tmp/wiki/`, titles
every file, records the result in `.pages.json`, and writes the index.
`skills/wiki` is the bridge — `wikimap.py` translates, and the transport
is `_gitea.py`, the same one the issue side uses. There is no second
transport, and `tea` has no wiki subcommand to offer one.

The Gitea wiki is flat, and that fact shapes everything

There are no directories. A title of `a/b` is stored as one file named
`a%2Fb.md`, and Gitea escapes it by rules of its own: space becomes `-`,
`/` becomes `%2F`, and a literal `-` forces a trailing `.-` marker so the
two stay distinct. `Chain decisions — DC` under two levels of prefix
comes back as `Simple-Chains%2FParked%2FChain-decisions-%E2%80%94-DC`.

So `sub_url` is the identity, it is read back from whatever the API
returned, and it is never constructed. One built by hand that is almost
right does not fail — it creates a second page and abandons the first.

And a real subdirectory committed into a wiki's git repository is a ghost:
the file exists, the API and the web UI do not see it. `folder/page.md`
in this repo's own wiki is one. Nothing here clones a wiki repo.

A title is a decision, not a derivation

Titles come from the first heading, because there is no mechanical route
from `03-q-01-do-we-know-the-chain-participant-by-name.md` to
`Q-01. Do We Know the Chain Participant by Name`. But they are derived
exactly once. A re-import replaces bodies and keeps titles, so editing a
heading cannot rename a published page — which would not rename it, it
would publish a second one.

`--retitle` opts in. It finds the prior entry by `source` rather than by
path, because the path is derived from the title and a retitle moves it;
looked up by path the page would read as new and the next push would
duplicate it. The old file goes, `sub_url` comes along, and `pushed` is
cleared — a rename can leave the body byte-identical, and push decides by
body hash alone, so a stale hash would skip the rename forever.

Ordering is a `NN-` file-name prefix and never reaches the title. `00-`
means "this is the directory's own page", and that page is named for the
directory, not for its own heading: a child's title has to extend its
parent's exactly, and `ideas/00-intro.md` opens with "Ideas for chain
business requirements".

Path collisions are reported and never resolved. Picking a winner is how
a discussion loses a document.

The index is navigation, not decoration

Nothing draws a tree from flat titles. `page_index.py` writes one as an
ordinary page, nested by title depth rather than by manifest path order —
those disagree, since on disk `Top/System.md` sorts before
`Top/Ideas/Scale.md` while in the hierarchy System is a child and Scale a
grandchild. A parent with no page of its own still gets a node, so its
children are not hidden.

Links use `sub_url` when there is one and Gitea's `[[Title|label]]`
syntax when there is not, so the order is push, rebuild, push.

The same stances as the issue store, for the same reasons

Pull overwrites, push is additive and never deletes, change detection is
one hash and there is no drift model. A page with no `sub_url` has never
been published, and that is a durable state.

Issues gain a `wiki:` field holding page titles — titles, not URLs, so
the reference stays in the domain. It already round-trips as a foreign
key; this documents it.

Verified against a live Gitea 1.26.1: create, update with a message,
unchanged-skip, prefix-filtered pull, byte-identical round trip, and the
per-page revision history carrying the operator's own words. The probe
pages were deleted afterwards.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 16:29:55 +05:00
naudachu 257c547e22 merge: merge checkbox state on pull instead of overwriting it 2026-08-10 15:52:50 +05:00
naudachu d4c43464e5 feat: merge checkbox state on pull instead of overwriting it
A tick was lost in both directions: pull wrote the server body as-is,
push sent the local body as-is, last writer won. Tick it in the web UI
and the first `push.py --update` dropped it; tick it locally and the
first pull dropped it.

The usual answer is drift tracking and a three-way merge, which this
repo rejected on purpose. It is not needed. A tick is monotone — an item
only travels `[ ]` -> `[x]` — so unioning the two sides is a set union,
not conflict resolution. One rule for one line type replaces the whole
mechanism, and the store stays "not a mirror".

`map.merge_checkbox_state` is pure and does the work; `from_api` takes
the local body as an optional argument; `pull.py` hands it the copy
already on disk. Checkbox parsing is imported from `skills/issue`
(`checkboxes` / `set_checkbox`), never redefined here — the domain layer
is untouched.

The same item text more than once is read as a set: one ticked local
item ticks every server line with that text. Pairing duplicates up by
order is the alternative, and it can still drop a tick — which is the
bug being fixed.

The price is documented, not hidden: unticking is not monotone, so a box
unticked in the web UI comes back on the next pull. Untick locally, then
push.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 15:52:11 +05:00
naudachu 47f53a7edc test: check the domain layer against sys.stdlib_module_names
The layering test pinned an exact import set, so any new stdlib import in
skills/issue tripped it — 'collections', added by issue_ac.py, did. Assert
the rule AGENTS.md actually states (stdlib only, never subprocess) instead
of a frozen snapshot of it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 15:43:24 +05:00
naudachu 484da64621 merge: tick in-body checkboxes from a domain script
# Conflicts:
#	AGENTS.md
2026-08-10 15:42:38 +05:00
naudachu 31f7c39155 merge: write issue dependencies to Gitea on push 2026-08-10 15:41:37 +05:00
naudachu f230f98f35 merge: reconcile the feature-container convention with the depends validator 2026-08-10 15:41:30 +05:00
naudachu b72f619fda merge: resolve the issue store path independently of the working directory 2026-08-10 15:41:19 +05:00
naudachu 62c8ff976d feat: tick in-body checkboxes from a domain script
A checkbox is the one part of a body that is state and not prose.
Everything else is written once; boxes get ticked as the work goes, and
until now the only ways to tick one were a human with an editor or a
model rewriting the whole body. The second is worse: the rewrite re-flows
lines and re-words sentences, so the issue's diff swells around a change
that means one character. Progress was invisible too — issue_index.py
builds INDEX.md from metadata and never looked inside a body, so "3 of 7
done" required opening the file.

All three pieces are domain: a checkbox is body syntax, which is part of
the answer to "what is an issue". The parser goes in issue.py so the sync
layer can reuse it instead of redefining the format on its own side.

issue.py gains checkboxes(text) -> [Checkbox(index, line, end_line,
checked, text, section)], plus set_checkbox(text, item, checked) and
checkbox_progress(text). All pure, no I/O, importable from another layer.
The scan covers the whole text, in any section: the type/feature template
keeps child issues as checkboxes under `## Issues`, so binding the parser
to `## Acceptance criteria` would silently lose half of them; the heading
is recorded, never required. Only a marker line opens an item, so a
wrapped continuation line belongs to the item above it rather than
counting as one of its own. A `- [ ]` inside a code fence is an example
of the markup and is skipped. Line numbers are relative to the text
given, which is what lets a caller work on a body or on a whole file.

issue_ac.py lists the items numbered, grouped by heading, and ticks one
by number or by substring. An ambiguous substring is an error that prints
the matches — a coin flip would tick the wrong box and look like it
worked. It patches the file rather than round-tripping through
Issue.to_text(), so exactly one character changes: metadata order,
wording, wrapping, trailing whitespace and CRLF endings all come back
byte for byte, proven by a diff in the tests.

INDEX.md gains a progress column: `3/7` for an issue with checkboxes,
blank for one without. Counted off the body at build time and stored in
no field — a second copy of the state would be wrong by the next edit.

issue_check.py is unchanged and stays that way on purpose: an unticked
box is work not done yet, not a malformed issue, and validate() carries a
comment saying so.

Delivering a tick to the tracker is out of scope — that is push.py
--update in /tea:sync.

format.md gets one clarifying bullet. It said acceptance criteria are
checkboxes but never said what a checkbox is, so the parser had to settle
questions the format left open: any section, wrapped items, fenced
examples. Those rules are now written down where the parser and the sync
layer can both point at them.

tests/ is new, and is the convention: plain stdlib unittest, no pytest
and no third-party deps, since the code under test may not have
dependencies either. Scripts are imported via sys.path.insert and every
fixture is built in a TemporaryDirectory, never in tmp/.

    python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -v     32 tests, OK

skills/issue/scripts/ still imports stdlib only, with no subprocess.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 15:41:15 +05:00
naudachu fb862554ed fix: reconcile the feature-container convention with the depends validator
`format.md` told a child issue to link back to its container through its own
`depends:`, while the validator wanted the container to list its children.
Satisfying both made a cycle, caught as an ERROR, so every `type/feature` with
a filled `## Issues` ended in either a warning or a hard failure — no third
option.

Variant B is chosen: the container depends on its children, and a child never
names its container. "The container is closed when its children are closed" IS
a dependency relation, so it belongs in the graph; "a child belongs to a
feature" is membership, and membership does not. The code already walked the
edge that way — `## Issues` is an edge source pointing container -> child — so
this rewrites the documentation to match instead of inverting the graph, and
the tree draws containers as roots for free.

- format.md: the `type/feature` template states the direction, shows the
  container's `depends:`, and says why the reverse cycles; the Dependencies
  section names `## Issues` as the second edge source.
- issue.py: `body_dep_ref_sections()` carries the section each reference came
  from, so the desync warning names `## Issues` on a container rather than a
  `## Depends on` that is not in the file. `body_dep_refs()` stays as a thin
  wrapper — `skills/sync/scripts/map.py` calls it and is untouched.
- tests/test_container_edges.py: the repo's first tests. Stdlib unittest,
  `python3 -m unittest discover -s tests`.

issue_check.py's cycle detector and issue_tree.py need no change: with the edge
pointing down there is no cycle to break and the container is already the root.

Refs claude-skills/tea#14

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 15:40:28 +05:00