`issue.store_root` and `_gitea.PAYLOAD_ROOT` were anchored on `__file__`, on
the reasoning that where an installation keeps its files is a fact about the
installation. That holds for an installation and not for a store.
Installed, the plugin therefore resolved every project's issues inside its own
directory — and a plugin cache is versioned, so the store moved on each
update:
~/.claude/plugins/cache/tea/tea/2.0.0/tmp/issues 5 files, 2 origin: local
~/.claude/plugins/cache/tea/tea/2.1.0/tmp/issues 12 files
~/.claude/plugins/cache/claude-skills/tea/2.2.0/ empty, the current one
Issues written from one project were invisible from the next, and an `origin:
local` file — which IS the issue, the only copy — was stranded a version bump
at a time. Two of them were.
The store is a fact about the project, exactly as the login pin is. So the
anchor is now an explicit marker an operator creates, `.tea/`, searched for up
from $CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR and then cwd — the pin's order, so the two cannot
disagree about which project this is. Inferred markers were tried and are worse
than useless here: `.git` is in every clone including this plugin's own, and
the agents-sync hook writes an AGENTS.md next to every AGENTS.md, so the plugin
root always carried one and cwd never got a turn.
With no marker anywhere, `store_root()` is None and every entry point reports
which directories it searched. A store in a plausible-looking directory is the
failure this replaces, so nothing falls back to one.
- `.tea/` holds the store and the transport's scratchpad: `.tea/issues`,
`.tea/payload`. One marker, one walk, one gitignore line.
- `issue_init.py` creates it, moves an old `tmp/issues` store in rather than
copying, adds `.tea/` to `.gitignore`, and refuses to pick a winner when both
sides hold the same file name.
- A linked worktree has no marker — it is gitignored — and reaches the main
checkout's store by the hop the pin already took.
- `parents`, `gitdir_of` and `main_worktree` move from `pin.py` into the domain
and `pin.py` imports them. The domain depends on nothing, so it is the layer
all three callers can borrow from, and the walk stays written once: the
guard, the transport and the store cannot disagree about a directory.
The suite stopped copying the script layers into its fixtures. That is what hid
this: with the scripts inside the fixture, the installation and the project
were the same directory. They are now deliberately far apart, and a regression
test asserts the plugin tree gains no files when commands run against a project
somewhere else.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
tea — Claude Code plugin for the Gitea CLI
A Claude Code plugin that gives Claude a reference for the tea CLI and enforces a hard rule: every tea command runs under the login the operator chose, never one Claude picked.
What it ships
| Piece | What it does |
|---|---|
/tea:auth skill |
Prompts you to pick a Gitea login and pins it to the project |
/tea:issue skill |
Issues as units of work — create, read, grep, validate, walk the dependency graph. Entirely offline |
/tea:sync skill |
Moves issues between the local store and Gitea — pull, push, comment, close, evict |
/tea:use skill |
Tea CLI reference for everything that is not an issue — loads command docs on demand |
tea-runner agent |
Subagent on Haiku that runs the scripts and reports back a receipt — the mechanical half, off your main context |
tea-guard hook |
PreToolUse hook that blocks or rewrites every tea invocation |
The layering
An issue is a unit of work first and a Gitea row second. That is two layers, and knowledge flows one way:
skills/issue DOMAIN what an issue is: format, validation, dependency graph
▲ offline — no tracker, no network, stdlib only
│ imports
skills/sync BRIDGE md <-> Gitea issue JSON, then over the wire
▲
│ calls
tea-runner EXECUTION runs the scripts, reports a receipt — no opinions
Delete skills/sync and the issue domain keeps working. Work that lives only
on your machine is first-class, not a draft waiting to be uploaded. That is the
point of the split: you can plan, write, and validate without a tracker, and
publish only what you choose to.
Prerequisites
- Claude Code — CLI, desktop app, or IDE extension
- Python 3 — required by the
tea-guardhook (python3must be on$PATH) tea— Gitea's official CLI. Install withbrew install tea(macOS) or from gitea.com/gitea/tea/releases- At least one login configured:
tea logins add(interactive — run it in a terminal, not via Claude)
Installation
This is a Claude Code plugin — install it through the plugin marketplace, not by hand-editing settings.json.
-
Register the marketplace this plugin ships in:
/plugin marketplace add https://git.noodles.cam/claude-skills/marketplace.gitAlready have a local clone? Point at the directory instead:
/plugin marketplace add /path/to/marketplace -
Install the plugin:
/plugin install tea@claude-skills
The skills (/tea:auth, /tea:issue, /tea:sync, /tea:use) and the tea-guard hook load immediately. Use /plugin to enable, disable, or update it later.
The marketplace registration is written to
extraKnownMarketplacesand the plugin toenabledPluginsin your settings automatically — you don't edit those by hand. There is no top-level"plugins"settings key; if you've added one from older instructions, remove it.
First use
Run /tea:auth once per project. Claude will list your available Gitea logins and ask you to pick one. The choice is written to the project root's .claude/settings.local.json and takes effect immediately — no restart needed.
Once per project, not once per checkout: a git worktree shares its main checkout's pin. Both the hook and the scripts find it from inside a worktree, so don't run /tea:auth there — it would leave a second pin in a directory that disappears with the branch.
/tea:auth
After that, just ask Claude to do something with issues or Gitea — it loads the
right skill automatically. /tea:auth is only needed for the tracker side;
/tea:issue works without any login at all.
How the login guard works
Every tea invocation Claude writes must carry the literal placeholder --login "$GITEA_LOGIN". The tea-guard hook intercepts the Bash call before it runs, looks up the pinned login from .claude/settings.local.json, and rewrites the command to use it. The hook and the scripts look it up the same way — one search order, in skills/auth/scripts/pin.py.
Claude is blocked from:
- running
teawithout--loginat all - naming a login itself (e.g.
--login myaccount) - using any variable other than
$GITEA_LOGIN
This prevents silent fallback to the machine's default login (often a personal account) when working in a project that belongs to a different identity.
tea logins list and tea --version / --help are exempt — they don't touch Gitea data.
The tea-runner agent
The skills carry meaning; the scripts carry work. tea-runner is a subagent on
Haiku that does the second half in its own context and hands back a receipt —
what ran, what it touched, what failed, verbatim.
Delegate a batch: pull a milestone and rebuild the index, push the three
issues you just wrote, bootstrap the label set, post a comment from a file you
prepared. Spawning it for a single pull.py 42 costs more than running the
command yourself; the saving is in the loop, the retry, and reading somebody
else's stderr.
It cannot decide anything. No Edit, no Write, no --force, no closing or
retitling, no raw tea, no pushing beyond the set it was handed. A missing
type, a failed validation, an unpushed dependency come back as a question, not
as a guess. The tea-guard hook applies to it exactly as it does to the main
session — the pinned login is enforced on every call it makes.
Project layout
.claude-plugin/
plugin.json plugin manifest
(the marketplace catalog lives one level up, in
the repo root's .claude-plugin/marketplace.json)
agents/
tea-runner.md subagent (Haiku) that executes the scripts
hooks/
hooks.json registers the PreToolUse hooks
tea-guard.sh the guard (Python 3, no deps)
agents-sync.sh keeps AGENTS.md real and CLAUDE.md a symlink to it
skills/
auth/ /tea:auth — the identity layer
SKILL.md
scripts/pin.py where the login pin is and how it is found —
imported by _gitea.py AND by tea-guard.sh
issue/ /tea:issue — the issue domain, offline
SKILL.md
references/format.md canonical issue format (identity, types, templates)
scripts/ Python 3, stdlib only, no network:
issue.py domain module: slug identity, parse/render,
validation, taxonomy, dependency graph,
body checkboxes
issue_new.py create a local issue from its type template
issue_check.py validate against the format
issue_ac.py list the body's checkboxes; tick one
issue_tree.py draw the dependency graph
issue_evict.py drop closed issues the tracker also has
issue_index.py rebuild .tea/issues/INDEX.md
issue_init.py create the .tea/ marker that makes a
directory a project; migrates tmp/issues in
sync/ /tea:sync — the bridge to Gitea
SKILL.md
scripts/
map.py md <-> Gitea JSON, pure functions, no I/O
_gitea.py transport: login pin, tea api, pagination, filters
pull.py Gitea -> .tea/issues/
push.py .tea/issues/ -> Gitea, then drops the local file
remote.py discovery listing to stdout
comment.py post or edit a comment
close.py the state field, both ways
evict.py refresh state: from Gitea, then evict
labels.py put the canonical label set into a repository
use/ /tea:use — tea CLI reference (non-issue entities)
SKILL.md
references/tea/ command docs
AGENTS.md carries the same layout with the reasoning behind it; if the two
ever disagree, AGENTS.md is the one being worked from.
Local issue store
Issues live in .tea/issues/ as flat markdown with one metadata field per line
— so grep -l 'labels:.*type/bug' .tea/issues/*.md works without a parser.
Run issue_init.py once per project. It creates the .tea/ marker, which
is what every script resolves the store from: they walk up from the working
directory to the nearest one. The marker is never inferred from the tree, and
with none anywhere the commands stop and name the directories they searched
rather than picking a plausible one.
python3 <plugin>/skills/issue/scripts/issue_init.py
It is idempotent, adds .tea/ to .gitignore, and moves an older
tmp/issues store in if it finds one. Don't run it inside a git worktree: the
marker is gitignored, so a worktree has none by design and reaches the main
checkout's store on its own — exactly like the login pin.
An origin: local file is the issue — the store, and the only copy.
Anything with origin: gitea is a working copy of something the tracker
already has, and it is deleted as soon as a push confirms the tracker is up to
date:
- Identity is a slug (
wire-sqlc-appclick.md), never a tracker number. Numbers live in agitea:field. origin: localis a complete state. An issue that never leaves your machine is valid and finished — but it is not permanent: pushing ends it.- A successful push deletes the local file (
--updatetoo) and prints the number and URL it now lives at. Only after a confirmed response: a failed call leaves the file exactly where it was. Get it back withpull.py <n>— same slug, samedepends:, even after a rename in Gitea. - Pulling overwrites the body: a fetch, not a merge. It is also how a pushed issue comes back.
- Nothing tracks drift, and there is no second copy to drift. A file that is still here has not been pushed.