An issue was a Gitea row that happened to be cached locally: its identity was the tracker's number (42.md), its dependencies were tracker numbers (depends: [#12]), and a local issue existed only as a draft that push deleted on success. Nothing could be planned or tracked without a tracker. Split into layers, with knowledge flowing one way: skills/issue DOMAIN what an issue is: format, validation, dep graph ^ offline; stdlib imports only, no subprocess | imports skills/sync BRIDGE map.py md <-> Gitea JSON, pure, no I/O _gitea.py login pin, api, pagination, filters skills/use REFERENCE tea CLI docs for non-issue entities skills/issue never imports skills/sync. Delete the sync layer and the domain keeps working. Identity is now a slug derived from the title (wire-sqlc-appclick.md) and is stable across retitles and pushes. Tracker numbers live in a `gitea:` field, never in a file name and never in `depends:`; the pair is indexed in .remote.json, which is a cache over the files, not a second source of truth. Behavior changes: - Pushing is additive. The file is never deleted; it gains gitea:/url:/ synced: and origin: flips from local to gitea. `origin: local` is a durable state, not a pending one. - Pushes go in topological order so dependencies get numbers first. - The dependency graph is computed offline from `depends:` metadata; body prose is passed through unchanged in both directions rather than being rewritten between slugs and #N. - `origin` is domain-owned (whether work exists elsewhere is a fact about the work); the handle and how to reach it stay with sync. Script moves: issue_get.py -> sync/pull.py issue_push.py -> sync/push.py issue_list.py -> sync/remote.py issue_index.py -> issue/issue_index.py _tea.py -> split into issue/issue.py, sync/map.py, sync/_gitea.py New: issue/issue_new.py, issue/issue_check.py, issue/issue_tree.py, and sync/comment.py — comment posting was the last issue operation still hand-rolled through raw `tea api`. references/issue-format.md moves to skills/issue/references/format.md; label hex colors move out of it into map.py, since a color is how a tracker paints a chip, not what an issue is. Verified: offline path end to end (new, check, tree, index, push --dry-run) and read-only against Gitea (remote listing, pull with mapping, comment guard). Write paths of push.py and comment.py are not exercised here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
10 KiB
Issue format
Canonical format for every issue in this project, whether it ever reaches a tracker or not. Designed to be unambiguous for both humans and LLMs: fixed English section headers in a fixed order, verifiable acceptance criteria, one issue = one deliverable. Source spec: the project wiki (Issues-Workflow).
Nothing here depends on Gitea. How these files are mapped onto a tracker is the
sync layer's business — see /tea:sync.
Identity
An issue is one file, tmp/issues/<id>.md, and id is a slug: lowercase
ASCII, digits, single dashes, derived from the title. The slug is the
identity. It is stable for the life of the issue — a retitled issue keeps its
slug, and an issue pushed to a tracker keeps it too. Tracker numbers are a
foreign key stored in a field, never the name of anything.
tmp/issues/wire-sqlc-appclick.md
Metadata block
One field per line, lists inline, so plain grep works without a parser:
---
id: wire-sqlc-appclick
state: open
labels: [type/task, tech/sql]
assignees: [naudachu]
milestone: v0.2
depends: [migrate-schema]
origin: gitea
gitea: claude-skills/tea#42
remote-updated: 2026-08-09T18:24:01Z
synced: 2026-08-09T18:40:00Z
url: https://git.noodles.cam/claude-skills/tea/issues/42
---
# Wire sqlc into the appclick repo layer
## Summary
…
| Field | Owner | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
id |
domain | slug; equals the file name |
state |
domain | open or closed |
labels |
domain | see namespaces below; exactly one type/* |
assignees |
domain | logins; may be empty |
milestone |
domain | title, or none |
depends |
domain | ids this issue depends on — the authoritative graph |
origin |
domain | local, or the name of a tracker this also lives in |
gitea |
sync | the handle in that tracker: owner/repo#N |
url, synced, remote-updated, comments |
sync | bookkeeping |
Domain fields render first, in the order above; sync fields follow, sorted.
origin is domain-owned on purpose: whether a piece of work exists anywhere
but here is a fact about the work. Where that is, and how to reach it, is the
sync layer's business — the domain carries gitea: and the rest through
load/save verbatim and never reads them. That passthrough is why one file can
represent a local issue and a synced one without a second format.
origin: local is a durable state, not a pending one. An issue that never
leaves this machine is complete and valid. Pushing is optional and additive.
Language rules
- Issue title: English, imperative mood, no type prefix — the type lives in
the label, not the title. Good:
Fix tea-guard crash on empty settings file. Bad:fix: crash,[bug] crash,Крашится гвард. - Section headers: the exact English literals below, as
##headings, in the given order. Do not translate, rename, or reorder them. - Body prose (text inside sections): Russian.
Label namespaces
Four namespaces classify an issue. Two are exclusive (at most one label from the namespace), two are free-form:
| Namespace | Exclusive | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
type/* |
yes | What kind of work; primarily its business value. Mandatory, exactly one. |
severity/* |
yes | Business impact. At most one; apply when the impact is known. |
tech/* |
no | Technology the issue is bound to. Any number. |
comp/* |
no | System component of this repo. Any number; no preset — project-specific. |
type/* — mandatory, exactly one
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
type/bug |
Something behaves incorrectly in existing code |
type/task |
Implementation of new functionality |
type/refactor |
Internal restructuring: file moves, architecture; behavior must not change |
type/test |
Writing or fixing tests |
type/feature |
Container: several issues delivering one unit of business value |
type/draft |
Idea captured for later; not ready for work |
severity/* — at most one
severity/low, severity/medium, severity/high, severity/showstopper,
severity/critical.
tech/* — any number
Technology-bound labels, e.g. tech/sql (pgx, sqlc, sql-migrate — persistent
storage), tech/obs (grafana, loki, prometheus, alloy — observability),
tech/postgres.
comp/* — any number
Components of this repo's system, e.g. comp/appclick. No preset list —
derive from the project.
Label colors are not part of the format: a hex code is how a tracker paints a chip, not what an issue is. They live in
skills/sync/scripts/map.pyand are applied on push.
Dependencies
depends: in the metadata block is the graph, and it holds ids:
depends: [migrate-schema, add-pool-cfg]
An optional ## Depends on section, placed right after ## Spec, carries the
human explanation — one reference per line, with a reason where it helps:
## Depends on
- migrate-schema — нужна схема БД из этого issue
- add-pool-cfg
The section is prose and is passed to and from a tracker unchanged; only
depends: is walked when the graph is computed. Keeping them consistent is on
you — issue_check.py warns when the section names an id that depends: does
not list. Omit the section when there are no dependencies; never write an empty
one.
Draw the graph with issue_tree.py. The reverse direction is a grep:
grep -ln 'depends:.*migrate-schema' tmp/issues/*.md
Shared rules
## Summaryis always the first section;## Acceptance criteriais always present (exception:type/draft). These two are the anchors every reader (human or LLM) relies on.## Specis mandatory in every type. Its value is a repo path (docs/specs/auth.md), a URL, or the literalnonewhen no spec exists. Never omit the section and never invent a link —noneis an explicit, valid answer.- Acceptance criteria are
- [ ]checkboxes; each item is an objectively checkable condition, not an aspiration. - Code references use the
path/file.ext:lineform; related issues by id. - Screenshots are allowed but their content must be duplicated as text — an LLM reading these files cannot see images.
- If acceptance criteria grow past ~5 unrelated items, split the issue (or
promote it to a
type/featurecontainer with child issues).
Template: type/bug
## Summary
Что сломано и где проявляется, одно-два предложения.
## Spec
`docs/specs/auth.md`, URL — или `none`.
## Steps to reproduce
1. …
2. …
## Expected
Что должно было произойти.
## Actual
Что происходит на самом деле: вывод команды, лог.
## Environment
Только релевантное: версии, ОС, конфигурация.
## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] баг не воспроизводится по шагам выше
- [ ] добавлена проверка на регрессию (если применимо)
Template: type/task
## Summary
Что нужно сделать, одно-два предложения.
## Spec
Ссылка или `none`.
## Motivation
Какую проблему пользователя/системы это решает.
## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] проверяемое условие
- [ ] …
## Constraints
Что НЕ входит в объём; технические рамки. (опционально)
Template: type/refactor
## Summary
Что перестраиваем и в каких файлах (`path/file:line`).
## Spec
Ссылка или `none`.
## Motivation
Чем плохо текущее состояние: дублирование, связность, читаемость.
## Invariants
Что НЕ должно измениться: поведение, публичные API, форматы данных.
## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] проверяемое условие (тесты зелёные, старый путь удалён, …)
Template: type/test
## Summary
Что покрываем тестами и где (`path/file:line`).
## Spec
Ссылка или `none`.
## Motivation
Зачем: регрессия после бага, пробел в покрытии, флаки-тест.
## Test cases
- сценарий → ожидаемый результат
- …
## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] перечисленные кейсы покрыты и зелёные
- [ ] тесты проходят в CI
Template: type/feature
A container: one unit of business value delivered by several child issues.
Child issues carry their own type/* (task, bug, test, …) and link back
via their depends:. Keep implementation detail in the children; the feature
body stays at business level.
## Summary
Бизнес-ценность одним-двумя предложениями.
## Spec
Ссылка или `none`.
## Motivation
Какую проблему пользователя/системы это решает.
## Issues
- [ ] wire-sqlc-appclick — краткое описание части
- [ ] …
## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] все дочерние issues закрыты
- [ ] проверяемое условие уровня фичи (например, e2e-сценарий работает)
Template: type/draft
A parking spot for ideas that are not fleshed out yet. Minimal structure, no acceptance criteria required. Before implementation starts, a draft MUST be promoted: relabeled to a concrete type and rewritten into that type's template.
## Summary
Идея одним-двумя предложениями.
## Spec
Ссылка или `none` (для драфтов обычно `none`).
## Notes
Свободные заметки: что известно, открытые вопросы, варианты.
Containers beyond type/feature
- Milestone — a set of issues with an optional time bound. Locally it is
just the
milestone:field; a tracker-side milestone must already exist for a push to attach the issue to it. - Project — a set of issues tracked by status columns (Backlog, ToDo, InProgress, Ready, Done). Not represented in this format and not reachable through the Gitea API — web UI only.