A discussion leaves behind a directory of markdown somewhere outside this
repo, and the only durable home for it is the Gitea wiki. Getting it
there by hand means re-deriving the same three things every time: what
each file should be called, where it goes, and whether the page already
exists. Two skills wrap that, along the split the repo already uses.
`skills/page` is domain, offline, stdlib-only, and knows nothing about
Gitea. It imports a directory into a space under `tmp/wiki/`, titles
every file, records the result in `.pages.json`, and writes the index.
`skills/wiki` is the bridge — `wikimap.py` translates, and the transport
is `_gitea.py`, the same one the issue side uses. There is no second
transport, and `tea` has no wiki subcommand to offer one.
The Gitea wiki is flat, and that fact shapes everything
There are no directories. A title of `a/b` is stored as one file named
`a%2Fb.md`, and Gitea escapes it by rules of its own: space becomes `-`,
`/` becomes `%2F`, and a literal `-` forces a trailing `.-` marker so the
two stay distinct. `Chain decisions — DC` under two levels of prefix
comes back as `Simple-Chains%2FParked%2FChain-decisions-%E2%80%94-DC`.
So `sub_url` is the identity, it is read back from whatever the API
returned, and it is never constructed. One built by hand that is almost
right does not fail — it creates a second page and abandons the first.
And a real subdirectory committed into a wiki's git repository is a ghost:
the file exists, the API and the web UI do not see it. `folder/page.md`
in this repo's own wiki is one. Nothing here clones a wiki repo.
A title is a decision, not a derivation
Titles come from the first heading, because there is no mechanical route
from `03-q-01-do-we-know-the-chain-participant-by-name.md` to
`Q-01. Do We Know the Chain Participant by Name`. But they are derived
exactly once. A re-import replaces bodies and keeps titles, so editing a
heading cannot rename a published page — which would not rename it, it
would publish a second one.
`--retitle` opts in. It finds the prior entry by `source` rather than by
path, because the path is derived from the title and a retitle moves it;
looked up by path the page would read as new and the next push would
duplicate it. The old file goes, `sub_url` comes along, and `pushed` is
cleared — a rename can leave the body byte-identical, and push decides by
body hash alone, so a stale hash would skip the rename forever.
Ordering is a `NN-` file-name prefix and never reaches the title. `00-`
means "this is the directory's own page", and that page is named for the
directory, not for its own heading: a child's title has to extend its
parent's exactly, and `ideas/00-intro.md` opens with "Ideas for chain
business requirements".
Path collisions are reported and never resolved. Picking a winner is how
a discussion loses a document.
The index is navigation, not decoration
Nothing draws a tree from flat titles. `page_index.py` writes one as an
ordinary page, nested by title depth rather than by manifest path order —
those disagree, since on disk `Top/System.md` sorts before
`Top/Ideas/Scale.md` while in the hierarchy System is a child and Scale a
grandchild. A parent with no page of its own still gets a node, so its
children are not hidden.
Links use `sub_url` when there is one and Gitea's `[[Title|label]]`
syntax when there is not, so the order is push, rebuild, push.
The same stances as the issue store, for the same reasons
Pull overwrites, push is additive and never deletes, change detection is
one hash and there is no drift model. A page with no `sub_url` has never
been published, and that is a durable state.
Issues gain a `wiki:` field holding page titles — titles, not URLs, so
the reference stays in the domain. It already round-trips as a foreign
key; this documents it.
Verified against a live Gitea 1.26.1: create, update with a message,
unchanged-skip, prefix-filtered pull, byte-identical round trip, and the
per-page revision history carrying the operator's own words. The probe
pages were deleted afterwards.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A tick was lost in both directions: pull wrote the server body as-is,
push sent the local body as-is, last writer won. Tick it in the web UI
and the first `push.py --update` dropped it; tick it locally and the
first pull dropped it.
The usual answer is drift tracking and a three-way merge, which this
repo rejected on purpose. It is not needed. A tick is monotone — an item
only travels `[ ]` -> `[x]` — so unioning the two sides is a set union,
not conflict resolution. One rule for one line type replaces the whole
mechanism, and the store stays "not a mirror".
`map.merge_checkbox_state` is pure and does the work; `from_api` takes
the local body as an optional argument; `pull.py` hands it the copy
already on disk. Checkbox parsing is imported from `skills/issue`
(`checkboxes` / `set_checkbox`), never redefined here — the domain layer
is untouched.
The same item text more than once is read as a set: one ticked local
item ticks every server line with that text. Pairing duplicates up by
order is the alternative, and it can still drop a tick — which is the
bug being fixed.
The price is documented, not hidden: unticking is not monotone, so a box
unticked in the web UI comes back on the next pull. Untick locally, then
push.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The layering test pinned an exact import set, so any new stdlib import in
skills/issue tripped it — 'collections', added by issue_ac.py, did. Assert
the rule AGENTS.md actually states (stdlib only, never subprocess) instead
of a frozen snapshot of it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
A checkbox is the one part of a body that is state and not prose.
Everything else is written once; boxes get ticked as the work goes, and
until now the only ways to tick one were a human with an editor or a
model rewriting the whole body. The second is worse: the rewrite re-flows
lines and re-words sentences, so the issue's diff swells around a change
that means one character. Progress was invisible too — issue_index.py
builds INDEX.md from metadata and never looked inside a body, so "3 of 7
done" required opening the file.
All three pieces are domain: a checkbox is body syntax, which is part of
the answer to "what is an issue". The parser goes in issue.py so the sync
layer can reuse it instead of redefining the format on its own side.
issue.py gains checkboxes(text) -> [Checkbox(index, line, end_line,
checked, text, section)], plus set_checkbox(text, item, checked) and
checkbox_progress(text). All pure, no I/O, importable from another layer.
The scan covers the whole text, in any section: the type/feature template
keeps child issues as checkboxes under `## Issues`, so binding the parser
to `## Acceptance criteria` would silently lose half of them; the heading
is recorded, never required. Only a marker line opens an item, so a
wrapped continuation line belongs to the item above it rather than
counting as one of its own. A `- [ ]` inside a code fence is an example
of the markup and is skipped. Line numbers are relative to the text
given, which is what lets a caller work on a body or on a whole file.
issue_ac.py lists the items numbered, grouped by heading, and ticks one
by number or by substring. An ambiguous substring is an error that prints
the matches — a coin flip would tick the wrong box and look like it
worked. It patches the file rather than round-tripping through
Issue.to_text(), so exactly one character changes: metadata order,
wording, wrapping, trailing whitespace and CRLF endings all come back
byte for byte, proven by a diff in the tests.
INDEX.md gains a progress column: `3/7` for an issue with checkboxes,
blank for one without. Counted off the body at build time and stored in
no field — a second copy of the state would be wrong by the next edit.
issue_check.py is unchanged and stays that way on purpose: an unticked
box is work not done yet, not a malformed issue, and validate() carries a
comment saying so.
Delivering a tick to the tracker is out of scope — that is push.py
--update in /tea:sync.
format.md gets one clarifying bullet. It said acceptance criteria are
checkboxes but never said what a checkbox is, so the parser had to settle
questions the format left open: any section, wrapped items, fenced
examples. Those rules are now written down where the parser and the sync
layer can both point at them.
tests/ is new, and is the convention: plain stdlib unittest, no pytest
and no third-party deps, since the code under test may not have
dependencies either. Scripts are imported via sys.path.insert and every
fixture is built in a TemporaryDirectory, never in tmp/.
python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -v 32 tests, OK
skills/issue/scripts/ still imports stdlib only, with no subprocess.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
`format.md` told a child issue to link back to its container through its own
`depends:`, while the validator wanted the container to list its children.
Satisfying both made a cycle, caught as an ERROR, so every `type/feature` with
a filled `## Issues` ended in either a warning or a hard failure — no third
option.
Variant B is chosen: the container depends on its children, and a child never
names its container. "The container is closed when its children are closed" IS
a dependency relation, so it belongs in the graph; "a child belongs to a
feature" is membership, and membership does not. The code already walked the
edge that way — `## Issues` is an edge source pointing container -> child — so
this rewrites the documentation to match instead of inverting the graph, and
the tree draws containers as roots for free.
- format.md: the `type/feature` template states the direction, shows the
container's `depends:`, and says why the reverse cycles; the Dependencies
section names `## Issues` as the second edge source.
- issue.py: `body_dep_ref_sections()` carries the section each reference came
from, so the desync warning names `## Issues` on a container rather than a
`## Depends on` that is not in the file. `body_dep_refs()` stays as a thin
wrapper — `skills/sync/scripts/map.py` calls it and is untouched.
- tests/test_container_edges.py: the repo's first tests. Stdlib unittest,
`python3 -m unittest discover -s tests`.
issue_check.py's cycle detector and issue_tree.py need no change: with the edge
pointing down there is no cycle to break and the container is already the root.
Refs claude-skills/tea#14
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
ISSUE_ROOT was the relative `tmp/issues`, so "the store" was whatever
directory the shell happened to be standing in. It is the --out default
in all eight scripts of both layers, which made one `cd` — and a `cd`
outlives the command that ran it — enough for readers to report an empty
store on a full one and for writers to quietly build a second store
beside the first. `issue_index.py` run from inside tmp/issues left
tmp/issues/tmp/issues/ behind and exited 0.
The anchor is issue.py's own __file__, not cwd. A script's location is a
fact about the installation; cwd is a fact about the last `cd`, and the
scripts are invoked by path from wherever the agent happens to be. From
there `store_root()` walks up to the nearest repo marker — `.git`
(exists(), not isdir(): a worktree's .git is a file) or AGENTS.md for a
copy taken out of git — and joins tmp/issues. Markers rather than a
fixed number of `..` hops, because the layout is not a promise. cwd is
tried only if the scripts are not inside a repository at all.
The function lives in the domain layer and skills/sync imports it, so
both layers agree by construction — the direction the layering rule
allows. skills/issue stays stdlib-only.
An explicit --out still wins and is used exactly as typed: a relative
--out stays relative to cwd, because that is what the operator asked
for. No new environment surface.
Two consequences the issue also asked for:
- Missing is no longer reported as empty. `store_error()` returns one
message for a path that is not there and another for a store with no
issues in it.
- Nothing conjures a store as a side effect of a write. save() and
issue_index.build() require it instead of os.makedirs'ing it; only
issue_new.py and pull.py create one, and both say so on stderr.
Establishes tests/ — plain stdlib unittest, no pytest, no dependencies.
The store tests build a throwaway repo in a TemporaryDirectory (a .git
marker, a copy of both script layers, fixture issues) and run the real
scripts inside it as subprocesses from five different working
directories; tmp/issues/ is never touched. Against the pre-fix scripts
15 of the 21 fail, reproducing the report exactly — five stray stores,
including tmp/issues/tmp/issues.
python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -v
Closesclaude-skills/tea#15
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The local `depends:` graph never reached the tracker. push.py sent dependent
issues in topological order but created no native links, so `native_deps` in
_gitea.py was a reader with no writer and the slugs in `## Depends on` stayed
dead prose for anyone reading the issue in Gitea.
Once an issue has its number, every `depends:` entry that also has one now
becomes a real link: POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{index}/dependencies
with the blocker's IssueMeta. Topological order means the blocker is already
numbered, so no second pass is needed. Existing links are read back first, so
a repeat push is a no-op and never 409s; a link that fails anyway warns rather
than aborting a run that has already created issues. `--dry-run` prints the
links it would make and touches nothing.
The `## Depends on` prose is still passed through verbatim — the edge the
tracker acts on is the native link, not the text, which is exactly why the
text can be left alone. Removing a link that disappeared from `depends:` is
out of scope and now says so in push.py's docstring.
Establishes tests/: stdlib unittest, the transport stubbed at _gitea.api, no
network. Run with `python3 -m unittest discover -s tests`.
The POST body shape was confirmed against the instance's own swagger.v1.json
(Gitea 1.26.1), not assumed from upstream docs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
naudachu