Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
naudachu 62c8ff976d feat: tick in-body checkboxes from a domain script
A checkbox is the one part of a body that is state and not prose.
Everything else is written once; boxes get ticked as the work goes, and
until now the only ways to tick one were a human with an editor or a
model rewriting the whole body. The second is worse: the rewrite re-flows
lines and re-words sentences, so the issue's diff swells around a change
that means one character. Progress was invisible too — issue_index.py
builds INDEX.md from metadata and never looked inside a body, so "3 of 7
done" required opening the file.

All three pieces are domain: a checkbox is body syntax, which is part of
the answer to "what is an issue". The parser goes in issue.py so the sync
layer can reuse it instead of redefining the format on its own side.

issue.py gains checkboxes(text) -> [Checkbox(index, line, end_line,
checked, text, section)], plus set_checkbox(text, item, checked) and
checkbox_progress(text). All pure, no I/O, importable from another layer.
The scan covers the whole text, in any section: the type/feature template
keeps child issues as checkboxes under `## Issues`, so binding the parser
to `## Acceptance criteria` would silently lose half of them; the heading
is recorded, never required. Only a marker line opens an item, so a
wrapped continuation line belongs to the item above it rather than
counting as one of its own. A `- [ ]` inside a code fence is an example
of the markup and is skipped. Line numbers are relative to the text
given, which is what lets a caller work on a body or on a whole file.

issue_ac.py lists the items numbered, grouped by heading, and ticks one
by number or by substring. An ambiguous substring is an error that prints
the matches — a coin flip would tick the wrong box and look like it
worked. It patches the file rather than round-tripping through
Issue.to_text(), so exactly one character changes: metadata order,
wording, wrapping, trailing whitespace and CRLF endings all come back
byte for byte, proven by a diff in the tests.

INDEX.md gains a progress column: `3/7` for an issue with checkboxes,
blank for one without. Counted off the body at build time and stored in
no field — a second copy of the state would be wrong by the next edit.

issue_check.py is unchanged and stays that way on purpose: an unticked
box is work not done yet, not a malformed issue, and validate() carries a
comment saying so.

Delivering a tick to the tracker is out of scope — that is push.py
--update in /tea:sync.

format.md gets one clarifying bullet. It said acceptance criteria are
checkboxes but never said what a checkbox is, so the parser had to settle
questions the format left open: any section, wrapped items, fenced
examples. Those rules are now written down where the parser and the sync
layer can both point at them.

tests/ is new, and is the convention: plain stdlib unittest, no pytest
and no third-party deps, since the code under test may not have
dependencies either. Scripts are imported via sys.path.insert and every
fixture is built in a TemporaryDirectory, never in tmp/.

    python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -v     32 tests, OK

skills/issue/scripts/ still imports stdlib only, with no subprocess.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 15:41:15 +05:00
naudachu d8bd927f1d feat: add the tea-runner execution agent
The skills carry meaning, the scripts carry work. Splitting the second
half onto a cheap model keeps the main session's context for the part
that needs judgement.

tea-runner is a Haiku subagent with Bash/Read/Grep/Glob/Skill and
nothing else. It loads /tea:sync or /tea:issue for the command table
rather than carrying its own copy, so the skills stay the single source
of truth for the script surface.

It executes and reports; it decides nothing. No Edit and no Write, so an
issue body is out of reach. No raw tea, no --force, no closing or
retitling, no pushing past the set it was handed, one retry maximum. A
failed validation, a missing type, an unpushed dependency come back as a
question in a `blocked:` line. The reply is a fixed receipt — commands
with ok/FAIL, touched paths, stderr verbatim — never a payload dump.

Knowledge still flows one way: nothing under skills/ knows the agent
exists, and deleting agents/ changes nothing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-10 15:02:34 +05:00
naudachu 091dceec1d refactor: split issue domain from Gitea transport
An issue was a Gitea row that happened to be cached locally: its identity
was the tracker's number (42.md), its dependencies were tracker numbers
(depends: [#12]), and a local issue existed only as a draft that push
deleted on success. Nothing could be planned or tracked without a tracker.

Split into layers, with knowledge flowing one way:

  skills/issue  DOMAIN  what an issue is: format, validation, dep graph
        ^               offline; stdlib imports only, no subprocess
        | imports
  skills/sync   BRIDGE  map.py    md <-> Gitea JSON, pure, no I/O
                        _gitea.py login pin, api, pagination, filters
  skills/use    REFERENCE  tea CLI docs for non-issue entities

skills/issue never imports skills/sync. Delete the sync layer and the
domain keeps working.

Identity is now a slug derived from the title (wire-sqlc-appclick.md) and
is stable across retitles and pushes. Tracker numbers live in a `gitea:`
field, never in a file name and never in `depends:`; the pair is indexed
in .remote.json, which is a cache over the files, not a second source of
truth.

Behavior changes:

- Pushing is additive. The file is never deleted; it gains gitea:/url:/
  synced: and origin: flips from local to gitea. `origin: local` is a
  durable state, not a pending one.
- Pushes go in topological order so dependencies get numbers first.
- The dependency graph is computed offline from `depends:` metadata; body
  prose is passed through unchanged in both directions rather than being
  rewritten between slugs and #N.
- `origin` is domain-owned (whether work exists elsewhere is a fact about
  the work); the handle and how to reach it stay with sync.

Script moves:

  issue_get.py   -> sync/pull.py
  issue_push.py  -> sync/push.py
  issue_list.py  -> sync/remote.py
  issue_index.py -> issue/issue_index.py
  _tea.py        -> split into issue/issue.py, sync/map.py, sync/_gitea.py

New: issue/issue_new.py, issue/issue_check.py, issue/issue_tree.py, and
sync/comment.py — comment posting was the last issue operation still
hand-rolled through raw `tea api`.

references/issue-format.md moves to skills/issue/references/format.md;
label hex colors move out of it into map.py, since a color is how a
tracker paints a chip, not what an issue is.

Verified: offline path end to end (new, check, tree, index, push
--dry-run) and read-only against Gitea (remote listing, pull with
mapping, comment guard). Write paths of push.py and comment.py are not
exercised here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-09 23:37:32 +05:00
naudachu 335b0bbd54 feat: local issue cache and draft-then-push workflow
Replace fetch_issue.py with four scripts around a flat, greppable cache in
tmp/issues/. Planning stays offline and issues reach Gitea in one push:

- issue_get.py: fetch by key or by filter (--milestone/--label/-q). The list
  endpoint carries issue bodies, so a whole milestone costs one request per 50
  issues. Gitea silently ignores an unresolvable milestones= filter and returns
  the entire backlog, so the milestone is resolved up front and every returned
  issue is re-checked locally. --deps walks the dependency graph downwards via
  the structured sections plus native dependencies and writes tree-<slug>.md.
- issue_push.py: validate a local draft against the canonical format, create
  missing labels with the right colors and exclusivity, POST, delete the draft.
- issue_list.py: discovery to stdout, writes nothing.
- issue_index.py: rebuild INDEX.md from what is on disk.

Files use one metadata field per line with inline lists so plain grep works
without a parser. This is a cache and a drafting area, not a mirror: no drift
tracking, no sync back.

Projects are not fetchable — the projects API is 404 on Gitea 1.26; documented
alongside the milestone caveat.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-07 19:35:38 +05:00
naudachu 061196c41b feat: issue skill 2026-08-07 14:24:21 +05:00
naudachu 96661d2783 refactor: rename login skill to auth
`/tea:login` could not be invoked as `/login` because Claude Code
reserves that name as a built-in command. Renaming the skill to `auth`
frees the short form: `/tea:auth` and `/auth` both resolve.

Updates all references in the guard hook, README, plugin manifests, and
the use skill.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-18 15:22:10 +05:00
naudachu 47a95ba6cb readme: fix install via plugin marketplace
The install steps used a non-existent "plugins" settings key, so a fresh
clone loaded nothing. Add .claude-plugin/marketplace.json and document the
supported /plugin marketplace add + /plugin install tea@tea flow.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-05 22:20:54 +05:00
naudachu a97c1a6638 readme: python req added; 2026-06-03 06:35:31 +05:00
naudachu b8b4cb3eae readme 2026-06-03 06:34:28 +05:00