Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
naudachu 091dceec1d refactor: split issue domain from Gitea transport
An issue was a Gitea row that happened to be cached locally: its identity
was the tracker's number (42.md), its dependencies were tracker numbers
(depends: [#12]), and a local issue existed only as a draft that push
deleted on success. Nothing could be planned or tracked without a tracker.

Split into layers, with knowledge flowing one way:

  skills/issue  DOMAIN  what an issue is: format, validation, dep graph
        ^               offline; stdlib imports only, no subprocess
        | imports
  skills/sync   BRIDGE  map.py    md <-> Gitea JSON, pure, no I/O
                        _gitea.py login pin, api, pagination, filters
  skills/use    REFERENCE  tea CLI docs for non-issue entities

skills/issue never imports skills/sync. Delete the sync layer and the
domain keeps working.

Identity is now a slug derived from the title (wire-sqlc-appclick.md) and
is stable across retitles and pushes. Tracker numbers live in a `gitea:`
field, never in a file name and never in `depends:`; the pair is indexed
in .remote.json, which is a cache over the files, not a second source of
truth.

Behavior changes:

- Pushing is additive. The file is never deleted; it gains gitea:/url:/
  synced: and origin: flips from local to gitea. `origin: local` is a
  durable state, not a pending one.
- Pushes go in topological order so dependencies get numbers first.
- The dependency graph is computed offline from `depends:` metadata; body
  prose is passed through unchanged in both directions rather than being
  rewritten between slugs and #N.
- `origin` is domain-owned (whether work exists elsewhere is a fact about
  the work); the handle and how to reach it stay with sync.

Script moves:

  issue_get.py   -> sync/pull.py
  issue_push.py  -> sync/push.py
  issue_list.py  -> sync/remote.py
  issue_index.py -> issue/issue_index.py
  _tea.py        -> split into issue/issue.py, sync/map.py, sync/_gitea.py

New: issue/issue_new.py, issue/issue_check.py, issue/issue_tree.py, and
sync/comment.py — comment posting was the last issue operation still
hand-rolled through raw `tea api`.

references/issue-format.md moves to skills/issue/references/format.md;
label hex colors move out of it into map.py, since a color is how a
tracker paints a chip, not what an issue is.

Verified: offline path end to end (new, check, tree, index, push
--dry-run) and read-only against Gitea (remote listing, pull with
mapping, comment guard). Write paths of push.py and comment.py are not
exercised here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-09 23:37:32 +05:00
naudachu 335b0bbd54 feat: local issue cache and draft-then-push workflow
Replace fetch_issue.py with four scripts around a flat, greppable cache in
tmp/issues/. Planning stays offline and issues reach Gitea in one push:

- issue_get.py: fetch by key or by filter (--milestone/--label/-q). The list
  endpoint carries issue bodies, so a whole milestone costs one request per 50
  issues. Gitea silently ignores an unresolvable milestones= filter and returns
  the entire backlog, so the milestone is resolved up front and every returned
  issue is re-checked locally. --deps walks the dependency graph downwards via
  the structured sections plus native dependencies and writes tree-<slug>.md.
- issue_push.py: validate a local draft against the canonical format, create
  missing labels with the right colors and exclusivity, POST, delete the draft.
- issue_list.py: discovery to stdout, writes nothing.
- issue_index.py: rebuild INDEX.md from what is on disk.

Files use one metadata field per line with inline lists so plain grep works
without a parser. This is a cache and a drafting area, not a mirror: no drift
tracking, no sync back.

Projects are not fetchable — the projects API is 404 on Gitea 1.26; documented
alongside the milestone caveat.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-07 19:35:38 +05:00
naudachu 492c27df98 feat: align issue format with wiki workflow spec
Match the Issues-Workflow wiki (claude-skills/tea#1): types expand to
bug|task|refactor|test|feature|draft (feature becomes a container,
task takes over new functionality), add severity/tech/comp label
namespaces, an optional "Depends on" section, and templates for
test and feature. Milestone/Project containers documented.

Refs claude-skills/tea#1

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-07 18:06:16 +05:00
naudachu 061196c41b feat: issue skill 2026-08-07 14:24:21 +05:00