feat: discussion artifacts as wiki pages, in two new layers

A discussion leaves behind a directory of markdown somewhere outside this
repo, and the only durable home for it is the Gitea wiki. Getting it
there by hand means re-deriving the same three things every time: what
each file should be called, where it goes, and whether the page already
exists. Two skills wrap that, along the split the repo already uses.

`skills/page` is domain, offline, stdlib-only, and knows nothing about
Gitea. It imports a directory into a space under `tmp/wiki/`, titles
every file, records the result in `.pages.json`, and writes the index.
`skills/wiki` is the bridge — `wikimap.py` translates, and the transport
is `_gitea.py`, the same one the issue side uses. There is no second
transport, and `tea` has no wiki subcommand to offer one.

The Gitea wiki is flat, and that fact shapes everything

There are no directories. A title of `a/b` is stored as one file named
`a%2Fb.md`, and Gitea escapes it by rules of its own: space becomes `-`,
`/` becomes `%2F`, and a literal `-` forces a trailing `.-` marker so the
two stay distinct. `Chain decisions — DC` under two levels of prefix
comes back as `Simple-Chains%2FParked%2FChain-decisions-%E2%80%94-DC`.

So `sub_url` is the identity, it is read back from whatever the API
returned, and it is never constructed. One built by hand that is almost
right does not fail — it creates a second page and abandons the first.

And a real subdirectory committed into a wiki's git repository is a ghost:
the file exists, the API and the web UI do not see it. `folder/page.md`
in this repo's own wiki is one. Nothing here clones a wiki repo.

A title is a decision, not a derivation

Titles come from the first heading, because there is no mechanical route
from `03-q-01-do-we-know-the-chain-participant-by-name.md` to
`Q-01. Do We Know the Chain Participant by Name`. But they are derived
exactly once. A re-import replaces bodies and keeps titles, so editing a
heading cannot rename a published page — which would not rename it, it
would publish a second one.

`--retitle` opts in. It finds the prior entry by `source` rather than by
path, because the path is derived from the title and a retitle moves it;
looked up by path the page would read as new and the next push would
duplicate it. The old file goes, `sub_url` comes along, and `pushed` is
cleared — a rename can leave the body byte-identical, and push decides by
body hash alone, so a stale hash would skip the rename forever.

Ordering is a `NN-` file-name prefix and never reaches the title. `00-`
means "this is the directory's own page", and that page is named for the
directory, not for its own heading: a child's title has to extend its
parent's exactly, and `ideas/00-intro.md` opens with "Ideas for chain
business requirements".

Path collisions are reported and never resolved. Picking a winner is how
a discussion loses a document.

The index is navigation, not decoration

Nothing draws a tree from flat titles. `page_index.py` writes one as an
ordinary page, nested by title depth rather than by manifest path order —
those disagree, since on disk `Top/System.md` sorts before
`Top/Ideas/Scale.md` while in the hierarchy System is a child and Scale a
grandchild. A parent with no page of its own still gets a node, so its
children are not hidden.

Links use `sub_url` when there is one and Gitea's `[[Title|label]]`
syntax when there is not, so the order is push, rebuild, push.

The same stances as the issue store, for the same reasons

Pull overwrites, push is additive and never deletes, change detection is
one hash and there is no drift model. A page with no `sub_url` has never
been published, and that is a durable state.

Issues gain a `wiki:` field holding page titles — titles, not URLs, so
the reference stays in the domain. It already round-trips as a foreign
key; this documents it.

Verified against a live Gitea 1.26.1: create, update with a message,
unchanged-skip, prefix-filtered pull, byte-identical round trip, and the
per-page revision history carrying the operator's own words. The probe
pages were deleted afterwards.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
naudachu
2026-08-10 16:29:55 +05:00
parent 257c547e22
commit 1815d91cdf
16 changed files with 2319 additions and 26 deletions
+60 -14
View File
@@ -15,14 +15,18 @@
## Layers
The hard rule of this repo. Knowledge flows one way only:
The hard rule of this repo. Two domains, two bridges, one transport, and
knowledge flows one way only:
```
skills/issue DOMAIN what an issue is: format, validation, dependency graph
skills/page DOMAIN what a page tree is: title <-> path, order, the index
▲ offline — no tracker, no network, stdlib imports only
│ imports
skills/sync BRIDGE map.py md <-> Gitea JSON, pure functions, no I/O
_gitea.py login pin, tea api, pagination, filters
skills/sync BRIDGE map.py md <-> Gitea issue JSON, pure, no I/O
_gitea.py login pin, tea api, pagination, filters
skills/wiki BRIDGE wikimap.py md <-> Gitea wiki JSON, pure, no I/O
transport is _gitea.py — there is no second one
skills/use REFERENCE tea CLI docs for everything that is not an issue
skills/auth IDENTITY pin the login the whole tracker side runs under
@@ -30,16 +34,19 @@ skills/auth IDENTITY pin the login the whole tracker side runs under
agents/ EXECUTION tea-runner: runs the scripts, reports a receipt
```
`skills/issue` never imports from `skills/sync`. Delete `skills/sync` and the
domain layer keeps working. The check is mechanical — every import under
`skills/issue/scripts/` is stdlib, and `subprocess` is not among them:
A domain never imports its bridge, and the two domains do not import each
other: delete `skills/sync` and issues still work, delete `skills/wiki` and page
trees still work, delete either domain and the other is untouched. The check is
mechanical — every import under a domain's `scripts/` is stdlib, and
`subprocess` is not among them:
```bash
grep -rh '^import \|^from ' skills/issue/scripts/ | sort -u
grep -rh '^import \|^from ' skills/page/scripts/ | sort -u
```
If a tracker concept (issue number, login, HTTP call, label color) shows up in
the domain layer, it is in the wrong place.
If a tracker concept (issue number, login, HTTP call, label color, `sub_url`,
`content_base64`) shows up in a domain layer, it is in the wrong place.
## Repo layout
@@ -59,6 +66,20 @@ the domain layer, it is in the wrong place.
- `scripts/_gitea.py` — transport: login pin, `tea api`, pagination, filters,
label ids, the remote-id map
- `scripts/pull.py`, `push.py`, `remote.py`, `comment.py`
- `skills/page` — a discussion's artifacts as a page tree (`/tea:page`),
entirely offline
- `references/pages.md` — canonical page-tree format; single source of truth
- `scripts/page.py` — domain module: title ↔ path, ordering, the manifest,
importing a directory of markdown, the index
- `scripts/page_import.py` — copy a directory of markdown into a space,
titling every file
- `scripts/page_index.py` — write the table-of-contents page
- `scripts/page_ls.py` — the tree, the titles, one sync-state tag per page
- `skills/wiki` — move page trees between a local space and a Gitea wiki
(`/tea:wiki`)
- `scripts/wikimap.py` — md ↔ Gitea wiki JSON, pure, no I/O
- `scripts/wiki_ls.py`, `wiki_pull.py`, `wiki_push.py` — transport is
`skills/sync/scripts/_gitea.py`
- `skills/use``tea` CLI reference for everything that is not an issue
(`/tea:use`); `references/tea/` holds the command docs
- `agents/tea-runner.md` — subagent on Haiku that executes the scripts and
@@ -83,12 +104,12 @@ stdlib-only and the tests hold the same line. `skills/*/scripts/` are not
packages, so a test that needs the domain module imports it with
`sys.path.insert`.
**A test never touches `tmp/issues/`.** Anything that needs a store builds a
throwaway repository in a `tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()` — a `.git` marker, a
copy of the script layers, fixture issues — and runs the real scripts inside it
as subprocesses. That is the only way to test behavior that depends on where a
script is run from, and it keeps the developer's own store out of the blast
radius.
**A test never touches `tmp/issues/` or `tmp/wiki/`.** Anything that needs a
store builds a throwaway repository in a `tempfile.TemporaryDirectory()` — a
`.git` marker, a copy of the script layers, fixture issues or artifacts — and
runs the real scripts inside it as subprocesses. That is the only way to test
behavior that depends on where a script is run from, and it keeps the
developer's own store out of the blast radius.
## Local issue store
@@ -113,3 +134,28 @@ plain grep works without a parser.
- Pulling overwrites the body — a fetch, not a merge.
- No drift tracking. `synced:` tells you how old your copy is; re-pull when it
matters.
## Local wiki cache
`tmp/wiki/<space>/` (gitignored) holds page trees — a discussion's artifacts,
organized. Same stance as the issue store, resolved the same way from
`page.py`'s own location, with the same `--out` rule.
- Identity is the **title**, and `/` inside it is the only hierarchy there is.
The Gitea wiki is flat: it escapes a title into one filename by rules of its
own (`space -> -`, `/ -> %2F`, a literal `-` forces a trailing `.-`).
- **`sub_url` is Gitea's address for a page and is never constructed.** It is
read back from the API and stored in `.pages.json`. One built by hand that is
almost right creates a second page instead of editing the first.
- **Never commit a subdirectory into a wiki's git repository.** Gitea does not
see it — the page exists on disk and nowhere in the API or the UI. Do not
clone the wiki repo to work in; use the scripts.
- A title is a decision, not a derivation. A re-import replaces bodies and
keeps titles, so editing a heading cannot silently rename a published page.
`--retitle` opts in, and the rename reaches the wiki on the next push.
- A page with no `sub_url` has never been published — a durable state, exactly
as `origin: local` is for an issue.
- Change detection is one hash (`pushed`). Pulling overwrites; pushing is
additive and never deletes.
- The `tea` CLI has no wiki subcommand. `tea api` is the only route, through
`_gitea.py`.