refactor: split issue domain from Gitea transport

An issue was a Gitea row that happened to be cached locally: its identity
was the tracker's number (42.md), its dependencies were tracker numbers
(depends: [#12]), and a local issue existed only as a draft that push
deleted on success. Nothing could be planned or tracked without a tracker.

Split into layers, with knowledge flowing one way:

  skills/issue  DOMAIN  what an issue is: format, validation, dep graph
        ^               offline; stdlib imports only, no subprocess
        | imports
  skills/sync   BRIDGE  map.py    md <-> Gitea JSON, pure, no I/O
                        _gitea.py login pin, api, pagination, filters
  skills/use    REFERENCE  tea CLI docs for non-issue entities

skills/issue never imports skills/sync. Delete the sync layer and the
domain keeps working.

Identity is now a slug derived from the title (wire-sqlc-appclick.md) and
is stable across retitles and pushes. Tracker numbers live in a `gitea:`
field, never in a file name and never in `depends:`; the pair is indexed
in .remote.json, which is a cache over the files, not a second source of
truth.

Behavior changes:

- Pushing is additive. The file is never deleted; it gains gitea:/url:/
  synced: and origin: flips from local to gitea. `origin: local` is a
  durable state, not a pending one.
- Pushes go in topological order so dependencies get numbers first.
- The dependency graph is computed offline from `depends:` metadata; body
  prose is passed through unchanged in both directions rather than being
  rewritten between slugs and #N.
- `origin` is domain-owned (whether work exists elsewhere is a fact about
  the work); the handle and how to reach it stay with sync.

Script moves:

  issue_get.py   -> sync/pull.py
  issue_push.py  -> sync/push.py
  issue_list.py  -> sync/remote.py
  issue_index.py -> issue/issue_index.py
  _tea.py        -> split into issue/issue.py, sync/map.py, sync/_gitea.py

New: issue/issue_new.py, issue/issue_check.py, issue/issue_tree.py, and
sync/comment.py — comment posting was the last issue operation still
hand-rolled through raw `tea api`.

references/issue-format.md moves to skills/issue/references/format.md;
label hex colors move out of it into map.py, since a color is how a
tracker paints a chip, not what an issue is.

Verified: offline path end to end (new, check, tree, index, push
--dry-run) and read-only against Gitea (remote listing, pull with
mapping, comment guard). Write paths of push.py and comment.py are not
exercised here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
naudachu
2026-08-09 23:37:32 +05:00
parent 335b0bbd54
commit 091dceec1d
24 changed files with 2504 additions and 1284 deletions
+106 -54
View File
@@ -1,73 +1,125 @@
---
name: issue
description: Create a Gitea issue in the project's canonical format. Run when the user asks to file/create an issue, or types /tea:issue. Writes a local draft during planning, then pushes it with issue_push.py, which validates the format, ensures exclusive type/* labels exist, and posts via tea api.
description: Work with this project's issues as units of work — create, read, grep, validate, and walk their dependency graph. Entirely offline; issues are local markdown files and need no tracker. Load when the user asks to file/create an issue, read or find issues, check an issue against the format, or see what depends on what. For pushing to or pulling from Gitea, load /tea:sync instead.
---
# /tea:issue — draft locally, push when agreed
# /tea:issue — issues as units of work
Thin procedure on top of the canonical format defined in
[`../use/references/issue-format.md`](../use/references/issue-format.md).
Read that file first — it is the single source of truth for types, labels,
templates, and language rules.
An issue is a markdown file in `tmp/issues/`. This skill covers everything you
do **with** an issue: writing one, reading one, checking it against the
canonical format, and walking the dependency graph.
Two phases, deliberately separated: planning writes **local files only** (no
network, no `tea`), and one push turns them into real issues. Scripts live in
`../use/scripts/` (see `/tea:use` for the full set).
**Nothing here touches the network.** No `tea`, no Gitea, no login. An issue
that lives only on this machine is a first-class issue, not a draft waiting to
be uploaded. Synchronizing with a tracker is a separate, optional layer —
`/tea:sync`.
## Phase 1 — draft (no network)
Read [`references/format.md`](references/format.md) before creating or editing
an issue. It is the single source of truth for identity, metadata, types,
labels, templates, and language rules.
1. **Read the format**: load `../use/references/issue-format.md`.
2. **Pick the type**`bug`, `task`, `refactor`, `test`, `feature` (a
container for several issues with one business value), or `draft` (for
ideas not ready for work). If it is not obvious from the request, ask the
user (one question).
3. **Write `tmp/issues/drafts/<slug>.md`**: a metadata block carrying
`labels:` only, then `# Title`, then the type's template.
## Identity: the slug
```markdown
---
labels: [type/task, tech/sql, comp/appclick]
---
# Wire sqlc into the appclick repo layer
The file name is the id and the id is a slug — `tmp/issues/wire-sqlc-appclick.md`.
It never changes, not when the title changes and not when the issue is pushed
somewhere. Tracker numbers live in a metadata field (`gitea: owner/repo#42`),
never in a file name and never in `depends:`.
## Summary
...
```
Consequence worth internalizing: **`#42` means nothing in this layer.** Refer to
issues by id.
English imperative title with no type prefix; every section of the
template present and in order; headers English, prose Russian; `## Spec`
filled with a repo path, a URL, or the literal `none` — ask the user if you
cannot determine which. Add `## Depends on` right after `## Spec` when the
issue depends on others (one `#N` per line); omit it otherwise.
One draft file = one issue. Several related issues = several drafts.
4. **Check the format without posting** (optional, free):
```bash
python3 ../use/scripts/issue_push.py --all --dry-run
```
## Scripts
## Phase 2 — push (once the plan is agreed)
All offline, all in `<skill-base-dir>/scripts/`.
```bash
python3 ../use/scripts/issue_push.py --all
| Script | What it does |
|---|---|
| `issue_new.py --type T --title "…"` | create `tmp/issues/<slug>.md` from the type's template |
| `issue_check.py [id…]` | validate against the canonical format; exit 1 on errors |
| `issue_tree.py [id…]` | draw the dependency graph from `depends:` |
| `issue_index.py` | rebuild `tmp/issues/INDEX.md` |
| `issue.py` | the domain module the others import — not a command |
```
tmp/issues/INDEX.md table of every issue — read this first
tmp/issues/wire-sqlc-appclick.md metadata block + `# Title` + body
tmp/issues/wire-sqlc.comments.md comment thread (written by /tea:sync only)
tmp/issues/tree-<id>.md saved graph (issue_tree.py --write)
```
The script validates the format (exactly one `type/*`, at most one
`severity/*`, English title, `## Summary` / `## Spec` / `## Acceptance
criteria` present), creates any missing labels — `exclusive: true` for
`type/*` and `severity/*`, canonical colors from the format doc — POSTs each
issue, prints `#N <url>`, and **deletes the draft**. The issue lives in Gitea
now; the local copy is not a mirror and must not linger.
## Reading: grep, don't parse
Flags: `--keep` writes `tmp/issues/<n>.md` instead of deleting, `--dry-run`
validates only, `--force` posts despite format violations (say why).
Metadata is one field per line with inline lists precisely so plain `grep`
works. `INDEX.md` first, then the files:
Report the issue URLs and the applied labels to the user.
```bash
grep -l 'labels:.*type/bug' tmp/issues/*.md # all bugs
grep -l 'origin: local' tmp/issues/*.md # never pushed anywhere
grep -ln 'depends:.*migrate-schema' tmp/issues/*.md # who depends on it
grep -A3 '## Acceptance criteria' tmp/issues/wire-*.md
grep -c '^- \[ \]' tmp/issues/wire-sqlc-appclick.md # open checkboxes
```
## Editing an existing issue
Read whole files only for the issues the task actually needs.
Drafts only create. To bring an existing issue to the format: fetch it with
`python3 ../use/scripts/issue_get.py <n>` (writes `tmp/issues/<n>.md`,
prints a compact line), restructure the body into the type's template without
losing information, then `PATCH repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{n}` via `tea api`
with the new title/body and ensure exactly one `type/*` label is set. Login is
always the placeholder `--login "$GITEA_LOGIN"` (see `/tea:use`).
## Creating an issue
1. **Read the format**: [`references/format.md`](references/format.md).
2. **Pick the type**`bug`, `task`, `refactor`, `test`, `feature` (a
container for several issues with one business value), or `draft` (an idea
not ready for work). If it is not obvious from the request, ask the user
(one question).
3. **Scaffold it:**
```bash
python3 <skill-base-dir>/scripts/issue_new.py \
--type task --title "Wire sqlc into the appclick repo layer" \
--label tech/sql --label comp/appclick --depends migrate-schema
```
English imperative title with no type prefix; `--depends` takes ids.
4. **Fill the sections** with Edit — every section of the template present and
in order, headers English, prose Russian. `## Spec` gets a repo path, a URL,
or the literal `none`; ask the user if you cannot determine which.
5. **Check it:**
```bash
python3 <skill-base-dir>/scripts/issue_check.py wire-sqlc-appclick
```
One file = one issue. Several related issues = several files, linked through
`depends:`.
The issue is now real and complete. Publishing it to Gitea is a separate
decision — `/tea:sync` — and does not change the file's status here.
## Editing an issue
Edit the file. Change `state:` to close it, edit `labels:`, tick checkboxes in
`## Acceptance criteria`, add ids to `depends:`. Re-run `issue_check.py`
afterwards, and `issue_index.py` to refresh the table.
If the issue is synced (`origin: gitea`), your edit is local until you run
`push.py --update` from `/tea:sync`. Nothing tracks that drift automatically.
## Dependency graph
`depends:` is the authoritative edge list; the body's `## Depends on` section
is prose for humans. `issue_check.py` warns when they disagree.
```bash
python3 <skill-base-dir>/scripts/issue_tree.py # all roots
python3 <skill-base-dir>/scripts/issue_tree.py wire-sqlc-appclick --write
```
A `type/feature` plus its children read as one document: draw the tree once for
the shape, then grep the files.
## Layering rule
This skill must keep working with `skills/sync/` deleted. Every import under
`scripts/` is stdlib, and `subprocess` is not among them:
```bash
grep -rhn '^import\|^from' skills/issue/scripts/ | sort -u
```
If you find yourself wanting a tracker concept here — an issue number, a login,
an HTTP call — it belongs in `/tea:sync`.